From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com (mail-wm0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A4245A9D for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 17:29:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id q128so283970499wma.1 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 08:29:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yBfO/Mdyucwd4kUTKbhbVPNeBCDEp1IpFuPwxrJdiyY=; b=l9dgl2K9+uGy2ZNcO5YsiiwsTiQuVnonW+tih/7ZsTjEQiP4Pub2Lb8HIKVMuKbguT yxNHjJG9VuUkFOBTJhigXdjRNjW9fs88edbM7U69kMFyBWF/bB0tAXfZ9nfTkFngM5wl Y238W8OvNzBfulW6akTMlJRlhe/7aN8oLuR/xmohmNtgHnjwuHH7uA9+nqdC8UuJ5Y5H MsEKyiFyDmiYpV+HPeYMrnu7LIkerzIRxuLOC3Ti5JlHoy/LF3K0F0xh3kQDEAY9pTG/ krLnQTDCuTa70BSfOMdq/sj4YI0KAVp9Y3hSYr8+W8dPM/ZnIXKXGww1v6zQ3xj1EHYJ xVKg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yBfO/Mdyucwd4kUTKbhbVPNeBCDEp1IpFuPwxrJdiyY=; b=dS1kL+TrOR7GlxhKukeN2b/Y2xpQSpAlqESW0a5U1kAz6vWYAArdildp79HbsDuBk+ ks4ZYguf9BCwZsArvoSgqoJel6UCo4nHDEBdBsWOjYOGsefaPWbYS5D2mYiu1avd/XXx hLXCS7LqGV4iBkqQVOfsht2AhbgBivXg/sHCBu37Ln70k9xibs34nsCMSnwgMq4Iejiv Yyv08jeI9c4MHXHqtoVVuvFlp3bee5+LO639FYel7rlR8W/tIkxIlJoyTvyAl6sjiGAb JKmCmddlDvIQRXC5X6Croruye2ScfoSMZwNSomgvOXrIeHLHBcgGEge5/4kDIiJxnyEj xM3w== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwMC5pTFYz/59/5/di42XxYX3SwT0iHe1SUczO8vOYQsBYSk68vgrKzrWwIsRCTZPHKt X-Received: by 10.28.165.207 with SMTP id o198mr4617584wme.87.1472225356364; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 08:29:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ya1sm20512421wjb.23.2016.08.26.08.29.14 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 26 Aug 2016 08:29:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Chao Zhu , gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: dev@dpdk.org, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, Bruce Richardson Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 17:29:14 +0200 Message-ID: <1743150.qJCZaSafhS@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <001701d1ff88$5b468b40$11d3a1c0$@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1471343279-24014-1-git-send-email-gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <001f01d1f864$46b65eb0$d4231c10$@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <001701d1ff88$5b468b40$11d3a1c0$@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] FW: [PATCH v6 0/9] enable lpm, acl and other missing libraries in ppc64le X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 15:29:16 -0000 2016-08-26 18:55, Chao Zhu: > Thomas, > > Any comments of this patch set? Are we waiting for more acks? Yes, especially for lpm and acl, a review from respective maintainers may be needed. Konstantin? Bruce? If no review is done in 1 week, it will be applied as-is. Gowrishankar, using --in-reply when sending would help to check the history of the patchset. Please remind for next time.