From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
Cc: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
dpdk-dev <dev@dpdk.org>, Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>,
Sunil Kumar Kori <skori@marvell.com>,
John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>,
Marko Kovacevic <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>,
Declan Doherty <declan.doherty@intel.com>,
Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>,
Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/8] trace: simplify trace point registration
Date: Mon, 04 May 2020 16:02:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1744936.tdWV9SEqCh@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALBAE1MuJYw6jWc+TB503UiotZ62x6DdRruo-UrMS8RkOx8hQw@mail.gmail.com>
04/05/2020 04:46, Jerin Jacob:
> On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 2:02 AM David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > RTE_TRACE_POINT_DEFINE and RTE_TRACE_POINT_REGISTER must come in pairs.
> > Merge them and let RTE_TRACE_POINT_REGISTER handle the constructor part.
>
>
> Initially, I thought of doing the same. But, later I realized that
> this largely grows the number of constructors been called.
> I had concerns about the boot time of the application and/or loading
> the shared library, that the reason why spitting
> as two so that constructor registers a burst of traces like rte_log.
I don't understand the concern.
How adding more constructors is affecting the library load time?
Do you have any number?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-04 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-03 20:31 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/8] Traces cleanup for rc2 David Marchand
2020-05-03 20:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/8] cryptodev: fix trace points registration David Marchand
2020-05-04 7:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Sunil Kumar Kori
2020-05-03 20:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/8] trace: simplify trace point registration David Marchand
2020-05-04 2:46 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-05-04 14:02 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2020-05-04 14:04 ` David Marchand
2020-05-04 14:39 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-05-04 17:08 ` David Marchand
2020-05-04 17:19 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-05-04 17:40 ` David Marchand
2020-05-04 17:54 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-05-04 21:31 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-05-05 3:43 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-05-05 7:01 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-05-05 7:17 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-05-05 7:24 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-05-05 7:33 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-05-05 8:23 ` David Marchand
2020-05-05 10:12 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-05-05 10:26 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-05-05 10:46 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-05-05 11:48 ` Olivier Matz
2020-05-05 11:35 ` David Marchand
2020-05-05 12:26 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-05-05 15:25 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-05-05 16:28 ` David Marchand
2020-05-05 16:46 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-05-05 16:58 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-05-05 17:08 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-05-05 17:09 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-05-05 17:20 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-05-05 17:28 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-05-05 20:10 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-05-06 6:11 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-07-04 14:31 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-07-04 15:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " David Marchand
2020-07-05 19:41 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-05-03 20:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/8] trace: simplify trace point headers David Marchand
2020-05-04 6:12 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-05-03 20:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/8] trace: avoid confusion on optarg David Marchand
2020-05-04 7:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Sunil Kumar Kori
2020-05-04 14:09 ` David Marchand
2020-05-05 5:45 ` Sunil Kumar Kori
2020-05-05 5:47 ` Sunil Kumar Kori
2020-05-03 20:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/8] trace: remove unneeded checks in internal API David Marchand
2020-05-04 8:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Sunil Kumar Kori
2020-05-03 20:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/8] trace: remove limitation on patterns number David Marchand
2020-05-04 8:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Sunil Kumar Kori
2020-05-04 14:14 ` David Marchand
2020-05-05 5:54 ` Sunil Kumar Kori
2020-05-03 20:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 7/8] trace: remove string duplication David Marchand
2020-05-04 9:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Sunil Kumar Kori
2020-05-03 20:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 8/8] trace: fix build with gcc 10 David Marchand
2020-05-06 13:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/8] Traces cleanup for rc2 David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1744936.tdWV9SEqCh@thomas \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=jerinjacobk@gmail.com \
--cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
--cc=marko.kovacevic@intel.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=skori@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).