From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F956A052A; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 19:45:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 911BD1DE7C; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 19:45:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A75C1DE60 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 19:45:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8F165C00D8; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 13:45:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 10 Jul 2020 13:45:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= YKxbCSdLH/ta1kB1/bumkT9sAyD/7ym+qFFd3WkcXzA=; b=GSZeqRsh7uWP2rY1 xYiQgiID06hke98FHd8Hk/rO6XSRQiI2AelIekLtxWL+DFw3w7DAungazQMm1qFT AQhJwjTrgA50nCPlvffro312DjohzUUPyt4Wio9GKMoz4TYQ1aIG/QDhNlZyQHYP QxkQ1EJ5fdVm5uPtkHOtNOF7tEQTW5Bi0tWZtUIohrnG1t/1wSo80V+MZZuuA+7X FRmh23useh6iwZzqq1lwpM8v0ySCz57k/F8IGTT71mpVZ8QYsELZ+TKO0ONYicEr 5JEPXLiABFCbpzow1nqf+hocOs/4qRA5+7hW/eqci7mJykAefkjKOfOwCG46aXLh pmQOyQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=YKxbCSdLH/ta1kB1/bumkT9sAyD/7ym+qFFd3WkcX zA=; b=U0qwPiaEwsPhggbFnsklMWaJlRSBP2OBr6zcTbeuvrmMvFkBmORztUB/H psH+HemP9Camv30lJs3KIwPtYenTz9uqPIgV8uF89PIs0idOM/Z0gsidu4siMJZP TzaAWS9O2XsduzO3iarvy/Xg3KqHHDKykjBub4IrVOxE+uk+w8ZS4GVtU7SIgkJM KvvoWy4pVk3VL8uLE0KZW60BjqRkK9oXeLPjyZIBKifAq6gnJCBaBF290HR9cFOv k2e14SaTIBYeXzM7dr+VtMbOZe+TTQ/UYFCL3C+1Tp+fq1pu2WN9lUQ5WCXkqf8l pOscSNg0VguFEAcPMuA0Il+Wxu3Zw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrvddugdduvdduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghl ohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EEF633280060; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 13:45:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com, Phil Yang , David Christensen Cc: dev@dpdk.org, david.marchand@redhat.com, drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com, jerinj@marvell.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, Ola.Liljedahl@arm.com, ruifeng.wang@arm.com, nd@arm.com Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 19:45:43 +0200 Message-ID: <1779792.OrDReWm4Ei@thomas> In-Reply-To: <1594115449-13750-3-git-send-email-phil.yang@arm.com> References: <1590483667-10318-1-git-send-email-phil.yang@arm.com> <1594115449-13750-1-git-send-email-phil.yang@arm.com> <1594115449-13750-3-git-send-email-phil.yang@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/4] maintainers: claim maintainers of C11 atomics X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 07/07/2020 11:50, Phil Yang: > Add the maintainership of C11 atomics code. Different maintainers focus > on different platforms C11 atomics. > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > +C11 Atomics Code Maintainer > +M: Honnappa Nagarahalli > +M: David Christensen I remember we discussed the need for identifying maintainers of C11 atomics code. However I doubt it will be very useful if there is no file associated with this responsibility. Maybe that relying on arch maintainers is enough?