From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com (mail-wm0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE5892BDC for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 19:20:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f45.google.com with SMTP id l132so280624391wmf.0 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 10:20:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vgjYJGgZTYj/YdT/JNBhOXt4ugBNFaEVOKZv8OiX3Rc=; b=qFYt3PAm5V4u2wYeHceha+UvImWpyvloQXft/Dig9s/qaVSWPthDtJxvamImeQo9zv V0JwhFoIMo6qs88/Mak7q4Lg1sFqAhPLge7+j1UGEhzVvHnUK9CksPpRx8koPp+8Mk4U +c4yFhZQ6R874v0zcZU4DbcrhjZvK2XG9vFycO4AjuFEZzjHYDtD6vhSJkEGq+4gTQLH b1H4R7kfyFzjJmpH8qv2TK4yuGtpOA5sIJruUOkDsMEVmG8/1uhzBB+rRju13OsJEj6Q Ab75xPFWJjY6fJgPLf2Sf5GK9Q3Ha1E2nbLl+t7c3qHJSKxR7pzav/XUpmEf//IT7nmC kr9w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vgjYJGgZTYj/YdT/JNBhOXt4ugBNFaEVOKZv8OiX3Rc=; b=C35p1wtdML1Ov8H20Mo6gim+CqKwRi8myMdyAWH3YJutabR2gNX0Xyq47Dt1LczZxT yqDSx3qkQEumLn3PI0m5OFFN6+mRP5/bCNLbrabgW8+HtCvdSSfh2v2bxdPL93kjcG7W o6ObE/dqCXeZTTXtsG1CG28zSutWiVY9brRJ6WavfRG3EP6zshG3gQQyPkeikGtH3BDg sJFREiczJZ9bF2EnlsmlxXMA7H+aP38JuBAVglut2kXmM6vzzcgCnnr3atqZCFxzbOJd LiwELcMioSnz2w6/uf7pWFLTlYpQTUs7pU72IxCD/9z9ZoxR5luOq6Dn71Y4L9h32z0R xWJQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNJkuJ2KKjHSz++c40xJJew5ZVq9ms1NqINuFmkcMmUHOqOMO0t6JYOUaj4e+MMISUW X-Received: by 10.28.230.144 with SMTP id e16mr4023943wmi.5.1474478408527; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 10:20:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (guy78-3-82-239-227-177.fbx.proxad.net. [82.239.227.177]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id lz5sm34382897wjb.24.2016.09.21.10.20.07 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 21 Sep 2016 10:20:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> Cc: dev@dpdk.org Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 19:20:06 +0200 Message-ID: <1780631.bJrZJTOcPN@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1472124636-27227-1-git-send-email-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> References: <1472124636-27227-1-git-send-email-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] kni: remove single mempool, single mem_chunk restriction X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 17:20:09 -0000 2016-08-25 12:30, Ferruh Yigit: > Use mempool buf_addr and buf_physaddr fields for address translation. > > Since each mbuf address calculated separately, the restriction of all > mbufs should come from a continuous memory restriction is no more valid. > > mbuf related FIFO's content changed, rx_q and alloc_q now carries > physical address of mbufs. tx_q and free_q content not changed, they > still carries virtual address of mbufs. > > Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> Applied, thanks The next 2 patches have been squashed with the first one as they are tightly related.