From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A9C5A04B3; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 18:53:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59F881BFB5; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 18:53:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EAA21BFA8 for ; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 18:53:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 186FE4DB; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 12:53:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 15 Dec 2019 12:53:09 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=/AGrQboBWs WhwKtz9SiO9pjrdKxlL2rFYe68npKv4Q4=; b=s5IOq32/ETk09pFIG5IRT/ErHK q8/+Ho4dyggChlOyL9RaJIa6sIR0gfTfa2XvSrtK9l1E1uZqNnRMJzp8aeZ3wvR/ TuL095mSzwb5jOqaF4i1diiBBDiv+F/MNJw4rqkqnRpRSOdSY99pn3sBVwJsmrNv 9X91is72WJp3U5yqM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=/AGrQb oBWsWhwKtz9SiO9pjrdKxlL2rFYe68npKv4Q4=; b=EaWGxGWExwelvwdp/TmIdK gbc5TOZO6TXRjS6pQ2wlGGPkyqmUX4mpDRcGccswISyEOEg0wrhgSY3qzipc2qZ+ JXaWLXbNcJHJ+5i+Z94fYWwTmVT7ucdRdDlpAysMo5fGYzUsjL6umihjN/KK+pEL EaDsjWBzNQ2jRdbcieqgIn93MGUbxu9OBniuGV3acnFf/ofgl+OeJvZlzRURSth8 sMawe053z0jGVdqiiHvNwdzh8LT6QC//hvyCsqaPB4iu6/yVw27KUR/vXr9VSJrd 6Ga+rXbbAdcV8b/rcCpZRS91NmRMnVoZ6giV4CfclMtJemd8hOuvT6gM4YmhOpHA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrvddtfedguddtlecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhephffvufffkfgggfgtsehtufertd dttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgrshcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehm ohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecuffhomhgrihhnpeguphgukhdrohhrghenucfkphepje ejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgr shesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id BE9CC80059; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 12:53:07 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: qian.q.xu@intel.com, john.mcnamara@intel.com, marko.kovacevic@intel.com Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2019 18:53:05 +0100 Message-ID: <1782105.TruDuU3fSW@xps> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: [dpdk-dev] Intel platform guide X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi, I am reading the Linux guide which has a section about Intel platform: http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/linux_gsg/nic_perf_intel_platform.html After more thoughts, I think it would be better to have such information in the platform guide: http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/platform/index.html I guess a lot more information could be added for the Intel platform here. Do you agree? Please who could do this move?