[dpdk-dev] Is Flow Director supported on the x540 chipset?

[dpdk-dev] Is Flow Director supported on the x540 chipset?

[Fulvio Risso]

Dear all,

by digging into the DPDK code it seems to me that FDIR is not supported 
on the x540 chipset, while it is supported on 82599.

Another message seems to mention the same problem here:

   http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2013-November/000806.html

Is there any plan to support FDIR to the x540 chipset?

	fulvio

Re: [dpdk-dev] Is Flow Director supported on the x540 chipset?

[Maxime Leroy]

Hi Fulvio,

I have been checked few information about the datasheet of the X540 card.
The X540 card is a derivative of the 82599. It's very similar to the 82599 card.

The both cards use the same hardware registers for the flow director.
Thus, the current code of the dpdk for the flow director should work
with X540 card too.

I think you only need to change few lines in lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_fdir.c:

  - if (hw->mac.type != ixgbe_mac_82599EB)
  + if (hw->mac.type != ixgbe_mac_82599EB || hw->mac.type != ixgbe_mac_X540)

Let me know if you can test it and please provide a patch if it works.

Thanks. Regards,

Maxime

On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Fulvio Risso <fulvio.risso@polito.it> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> by digging into the DPDK code it seems to me that FDIR is not supported on
> the x540 chipset, while it is supported on 82599.
>
> Another message seems to mention the same problem here:
>
>   http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2013-November/000806.html
>
> Is there any plan to support FDIR to the x540 chipset?
>
>         fulvio

Re: [dpdk-dev] Is Flow Director supported on the x540 chipset?

[Thomas Monjalon]

Hi Fulvio,

17/01/2014 12:24, Maxime Leroy:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014, Fulvio Risso <fulvio.risso@polito.it> wrote:
> > by digging into the DPDK code it seems to me that FDIR is not supported
> > on the x540 chipset, while it is supported on 82599.
[...]
> > Is there any plan to support FDIR to the x540 chipset?
> 
[...]
> I think you only need to change few lines in
> lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_fdir.c:
> 
>   - if (hw->mac.type != ixgbe_mac_82599EB)
>   + if (hw->mac.type != ixgbe_mac_82599EB || hw->mac.type !=
> ixgbe_mac_X540)
> 
> Let me know if you can test it and please provide a patch if it works.

Have you tried to patch and test flow director for X540 ?

thanks
-- 
Thomas

Re: [dpdk-dev] Is Flow Director supported on the x540 chipset?

[Mauro Annarumma]

Hi,
I'm trying to use Flow Director. Initially I used a X540 chipset and I was not able to make it work; I thought it was a compatibility problem with the controller. Maxime suggested to change some lines in the ixgbe_fdir.c file, I changed these lines but it
      did not give the expected results; 
   At this point I was sure that the problem was the incompatibility between the DPDK and the X540 chipset therefore I retrived a NIC whit a 82599 chipset and I repeated my attempts, unfortunately I got the some problems.
   
In order to be more clear I explain my attempts:
I try  to run the test-pmd app with the command-line option
      "--pkt-filter-mode=perfect", the app doesn't start (the rte_eth_dev_start
      function return an error) otherwise without the --pkt-filter-mode command-line option the application run
      normally. 

This is the command line I use to start the program:

frog@frog:~/dpdk-1.5.2r1/app/test-pmd$
 sudo ./testpmd -c 0x0f -n 2 -m 512 -- -i --portmask=0x3 --nb-cores=2 
--pkt-filter-mode=perfect --rxq=2 --txq=2


and the relative output:

...
Interactive-mode selected
Configuring Port 0 (socket -1)
Fail to start port 0 (ret=-5)*
Configuring Port 1 (socket -1)
Fail to start port 1 (ret=-5)*
Please stop the ports first
Done
testpmd> 

*ret=-5 is the result of the rte_eth_dev_start function

I guess someone was able to use FDIR, at least in the testpmd application. What am I doing wrong?
Best regards

> From: thomas.monjalon@6wind.com
> To: fulvio.risso@polito.it
> Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 17:47:21 +0100
> CC: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Is Flow Director supported on the x540 chipset?
> 
> Hi Fulvio,
> 
> 17/01/2014 12:24, Maxime Leroy:
> > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014, Fulvio Risso <fulvio.risso@polito.it> wrote:
> > > by digging into the DPDK code it seems to me that FDIR is not supported
> > > on the x540 chipset, while it is supported on 82599.
> [...]
> > > Is there any plan to support FDIR to the x540 chipset?
> > 
> [...]
> > I think you only need to change few lines in
> > lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_fdir.c:
> > 
> >   - if (hw->mac.type != ixgbe_mac_82599EB)
> >   + if (hw->mac.type != ixgbe_mac_82599EB || hw->mac.type !=
> > ixgbe_mac_X540)
> > 
> > Let me know if you can test it and please provide a patch if it works.
> 
> Have you tried to patch and test flow director for X540 ?
> 
> thanks
> -- 
> Thomas
 		 	   		  

Re: [dpdk-dev] Is Flow Director supported on the x540 chipset?

[Richardson, Bruce]

Hi,

can you please give a few more details about your setup? What version of the Intel DPDK are you using? I tried using the command you give below on my system with 82599-based NICs and testpmd starts up without any issues.

Here's the (clipped for brevity) output that I get:

$ sudo ./testpmd -c 0x0f -n 2 -m 512 -- -i --portmask=0x3 --nb-cores=2 --pkt-filter-mode=perfect --rxq=2 --txq=2
EAL: No free hugepages reported in hugepages-2048kB
EAL: Detected lcore 0 as core 0 on socket 0
EAL: Detected lcore 1 as core 1 on socket 0
... <snip>...
Interactive-mode selected
previous number of forwarding ports 4 - changed to number of configured ports 2
Configuring Port 0 (socket 1)
Configuring Port 1 (socket 1)
Configuring Port 2 (socket 1)
Configuring Port 3 (socket 1)
Checking link statuses...
Port 0 Link Up - speed 10000 Mbps - full-duplex
Port 1 Link Up - speed 10000 Mbps - full-duplex
Port 2 Link Up - speed 10000 Mbps - full-duplex
Port 3 Link Up - speed 10000 Mbps - full-duplex
Done
testpmd>


Perhaps you could also try turning on some of the IXGBE debug options in your compile time config e.g. defconfig_x86_64-default-linuxapp-gcc. Setting "CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IXGBE_DEBUG_INIT" and "CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IXGBE_DEBUG_DRIVER" to "y" might provide some useful output.

Regards,
/Bruce

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Mauro
> Annarumma
> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 9:45 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Is Flow Director supported on the x540 chipset?
> 
> Hi,
> I'm trying to use Flow Director. Initially I used a X540 chipset and I was not
> able to make it work; I thought it was a compatibility problem with the
> controller. Maxime suggested to change some lines in the ixgbe_fdir.c file, I
> changed these lines but it
>       did not give the expected results;
>    At this point I was sure that the problem was the incompatibility between
> the DPDK and the X540 chipset therefore I retrived a NIC whit a 82599
> chipset and I repeated my attempts, unfortunately I got the some
> problems.
> 
> In order to be more clear I explain my attempts:
> I try  to run the test-pmd app with the command-line option
>       "--pkt-filter-mode=perfect", the app doesn't start (the
> rte_eth_dev_start
>       function return an error) otherwise without the --pkt-filter-mode
> command-line option the application run
>       normally.
> 
> This is the command line I use to start the program:
> 
> frog@frog:~/dpdk-1.5.2r1/app/test-pmd$
>  sudo ./testpmd -c 0x0f -n 2 -m 512 -- -i --portmask=0x3 --nb-cores=2 --pkt-
> filter-mode=perfect --rxq=2 --txq=2
> 
> 
> and the relative output:
> 
> ...
> Interactive-mode selected
> Configuring Port 0 (socket -1)
> Fail to start port 0 (ret=-5)*
> Configuring Port 1 (socket -1)
> Fail to start port 1 (ret=-5)*
> Please stop the ports first
> Done
> testpmd>
> 
> *ret=-5 is the result of the rte_eth_dev_start function
> 
> I guess someone was able to use FDIR, at least in the testpmd application.
> What am I doing wrong?
> Best regards
> 
> > From: thomas.monjalon@6wind.com
> > To: fulvio.risso@polito.it
> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 17:47:21 +0100
> > CC: dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Is Flow Director supported on the x540 chipset?
> >
> > Hi Fulvio,
> >
> > 17/01/2014 12:24, Maxime Leroy:
> > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014, Fulvio Risso <fulvio.risso@polito.it> wrote:
> > > > by digging into the DPDK code it seems to me that FDIR is not
> supported
> > > > on the x540 chipset, while it is supported on 82599.
> > [...]
> > > > Is there any plan to support FDIR to the x540 chipset?
> > >
> > [...]
> > > I think you only need to change few lines in
> > > lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_fdir.c:
> > >
> > >   - if (hw->mac.type != ixgbe_mac_82599EB)
> > >   + if (hw->mac.type != ixgbe_mac_82599EB || hw->mac.type !=
> > > ixgbe_mac_X540)
> > >
> > > Let me know if you can test it and please provide a patch if it works.
> >
> > Have you tried to patch and test flow director for X540 ?
> >
> > thanks
> > --
> > Thomas
> 

Re: [dpdk-dev] Is Flow Director supported on the x540 chipset?

[Mauro Annarumma]

Hi Bruce,
your answer was really helpful. The application didn't work due to this line 
"if (hw->mac.type != ixgbe_mac_82599EB || hw->mac.type !=ixgbe_mac_X540)". 

I changed the || whit a && and now the application (with the FDIR mode active) runs on both X540 and 82599. 
Now I'm testing if the FDIR really works properly also on the X540 ; if it works, I will provide a patch.

Best Regards, 

    Mauro

> From: bruce.richardson@intel.com
> To: mauroannarumma@hotmail.it; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] Is Flow Director supported on the x540 chipset?
> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:28:37 +0000
> 
> Hi,
> 
> can you please give a few more details about your setup? What version of the Intel DPDK are you using? I tried using the command you give below on my system with 82599-based NICs and testpmd starts up without any issues.
> 
> Here's the (clipped for brevity) output that I get:
> 
> $ sudo ./testpmd -c 0x0f -n 2 -m 512 -- -i --portmask=0x3 --nb-cores=2 --pkt-filter-mode=perfect --rxq=2 --txq=2
> EAL: No free hugepages reported in hugepages-2048kB
> EAL: Detected lcore 0 as core 0 on socket 0
> EAL: Detected lcore 1 as core 1 on socket 0
> ... <snip>...
> Interactive-mode selected
> previous number of forwarding ports 4 - changed to number of configured ports 2
> Configuring Port 0 (socket 1)
> Configuring Port 1 (socket 1)
> Configuring Port 2 (socket 1)
> Configuring Port 3 (socket 1)
> Checking link statuses...
> Port 0 Link Up - speed 10000 Mbps - full-duplex
> Port 1 Link Up - speed 10000 Mbps - full-duplex
> Port 2 Link Up - speed 10000 Mbps - full-duplex
> Port 3 Link Up - speed 10000 Mbps - full-duplex
> Done
> testpmd>
> 
> 
> Perhaps you could also try turning on some of the IXGBE debug options in your compile time config e.g. defconfig_x86_64-default-linuxapp-gcc. Setting "CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IXGBE_DEBUG_INIT" and "CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IXGBE_DEBUG_DRIVER" to "y" might provide some useful output.
> 
> Regards,
> /Bruce
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Mauro
> > Annarumma
> > Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 9:45 AM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Is Flow Director supported on the x540 chipset?
> > 
> > Hi,
> > I'm trying to use Flow Director. Initially I used a X540 chipset and I was not
> > able to make it work; I thought it was a compatibility problem with the
> > controller. Maxime suggested to change some lines in the ixgbe_fdir.c file, I
> > changed these lines but it
> >       did not give the expected results;
> >    At this point I was sure that the problem was the incompatibility between
> > the DPDK and the X540 chipset therefore I retrived a NIC whit a 82599
> > chipset and I repeated my attempts, unfortunately I got the some
> > problems.
> > 
> > In order to be more clear I explain my attempts:
> > I try  to run the test-pmd app with the command-line option
> >       "--pkt-filter-mode=perfect", the app doesn't start (the
> > rte_eth_dev_start
> >       function return an error) otherwise without the --pkt-filter-mode
> > command-line option the application run
> >       normally.
> > 
> > This is the command line I use to start the program:
> > 
> > frog@frog:~/dpdk-1.5.2r1/app/test-pmd$
> >  sudo ./testpmd -c 0x0f -n 2 -m 512 -- -i --portmask=0x3 --nb-cores=2 --pkt-
> > filter-mode=perfect --rxq=2 --txq=2
> > 
> > 
> > and the relative output:
> > 
> > ...
> > Interactive-mode selected
> > Configuring Port 0 (socket -1)
> > Fail to start port 0 (ret=-5)*
> > Configuring Port 1 (socket -1)
> > Fail to start port 1 (ret=-5)*
> > Please stop the ports first
> > Done
> > testpmd>
> > 
> > *ret=-5 is the result of the rte_eth_dev_start function
> > 
> > I guess someone was able to use FDIR, at least in the testpmd application.
> > What am I doing wrong?
> > Best regards
> > 
> > > From: thomas.monjalon@6wind.com
> > > To: fulvio.risso@polito.it
> > > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 17:47:21 +0100
> > > CC: dev@dpdk.org
> > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Is Flow Director supported on the x540 chipset?
> > >
> > > Hi Fulvio,
> > >
> > > 17/01/2014 12:24, Maxime Leroy:
> > > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014, Fulvio Risso <fulvio.risso@polito.it> wrote:
> > > > > by digging into the DPDK code it seems to me that FDIR is not
> > supported
> > > > > on the x540 chipset, while it is supported on 82599.
> > > [...]
> > > > > Is there any plan to support FDIR to the x540 chipset?
> > > >
> > > [...]
> > > > I think you only need to change few lines in
> > > > lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_fdir.c:
> > > >
> > > >   - if (hw->mac.type != ixgbe_mac_82599EB)
> > > >   + if (hw->mac.type != ixgbe_mac_82599EB || hw->mac.type !=
> > > > ixgbe_mac_X540)
> > > >
> > > > Let me know if you can test it and please provide a patch if it works.
> > >
> > > Have you tried to patch and test flow director for X540 ?
> > >
> > > thanks
> > > --
> > > Thomas
> > 

 		 	   		  

Re: [dpdk-dev] Is Flow Director supported on the x540 chipset?

[Thomas Monjalon]

Hello Mauro,

14/02/2014 11:28, Mauro Annarumma :
> Now I'm testing if the FDIR really works properly also on the X540 ;
> if it works, I will provide a patch.

Have you tested FDIR on X540?

-- 
Thomas

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ixgbe: support flow director for X540

[Thomas Monjalon]

From: Mauro Annarumma <mauroannarumma@hotmail.it>

Flow director in X540 uses the same registers as in 82599.
So it just has to be enabled in the 82599 implementation.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Annarumma <mauroannarumma@hotmail.it>
---
 lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_fdir.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_fdir.c b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_fdir.c
index f15151a..0d91ff9 100644
--- a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_fdir.c
+++ b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_fdir.c
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ ixgbe_fdir_configure(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
 
 	PMD_INIT_FUNC_TRACE();
 
-	if (hw->mac.type != ixgbe_mac_82599EB)
+	if (hw->mac.type != ixgbe_mac_82599EB && hw->mac.type !=ixgbe_mac_X540)
 		return -ENOSYS;
 
 	err = configure_fdir_flags(&dev->data->dev_conf.fdir_conf, &fdirctrl);
@@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ fdir_add_update_signature_filter(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
 	union ixgbe_atr_input input;
 	int err;
 
-	if (hw->mac.type != ixgbe_mac_82599EB)
+	if (hw->mac.type != ixgbe_mac_82599EB && hw->mac.type !=ixgbe_mac_X540)
 		return -ENOSYS;
 
 	err = fdir_filter_to_atr_input(fdir_filter, &input);
@@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ ixgbe_fdir_remove_signature_filter(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
 
 	PMD_INIT_FUNC_TRACE();
 
-	if (hw->mac.type != ixgbe_mac_82599EB)
+	if (hw->mac.type != ixgbe_mac_82599EB && hw->mac.type !=ixgbe_mac_X540)
 		return -ENOSYS;
 
 	err = fdir_filter_to_atr_input(fdir_filter, &input);
@@ -674,7 +674,7 @@ ixgbe_fdir_set_masks(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct rte_fdir_masks *fdir_masks)
 
 	hw = IXGBE_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(dev->data->dev_private);
 
-	if (hw->mac.type != ixgbe_mac_82599EB)
+	if (hw->mac.type != ixgbe_mac_82599EB && hw->mac.type !=ixgbe_mac_X540)
 		return -ENOSYS;
 
 	err = ixgbe_reinit_fdir_tables_82599(hw);
@@ -784,7 +784,7 @@ fdir_add_update_perfect_filter(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
 	union ixgbe_atr_input input;
 	int err;
 
-	if (hw->mac.type != ixgbe_mac_82599EB)
+	if (hw->mac.type != ixgbe_mac_82599EB && hw->mac.type !=ixgbe_mac_X540)
 		return -ENOSYS;
 
 	err = fdir_filter_to_atr_input(fdir_filter, &input);
@@ -836,7 +836,7 @@ ixgbe_fdir_remove_perfect_filter(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
 
 	PMD_INIT_FUNC_TRACE();
 
-	if (hw->mac.type != ixgbe_mac_82599EB)
+	if (hw->mac.type != ixgbe_mac_82599EB && hw->mac.type !=ixgbe_mac_X540)
 		return -ENOSYS;
 
 	err = fdir_filter_to_atr_input(fdir_filter, &input);
@@ -859,7 +859,7 @@ ixgbe_fdir_info_get(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct rte_eth_fdir *fdir)
 			IXGBE_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_FDIR_INFO(dev->data->dev_private);
 	uint32_t reg;
 
-	if (hw->mac.type != ixgbe_mac_82599EB)
+	if (hw->mac.type != ixgbe_mac_82599EB && hw->mac.type !=ixgbe_mac_X540)
 		return;
 
 	/* Get the information from registers */
-- 
1.9.0

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ixgbe: support flow director for X540

[Maxime Leroy]

Thanks

On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com
> wrote:

> From: Mauro Annarumma <mauroannarumma@hotmail.it>
>
> Flow director in X540 uses the same registers as in 82599.
> So it just has to be enabled in the 82599 implementation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Annarumma <mauroannarumma@hotmail.it>
>
> Acked-by: Maxime Leroy <maxime.leroy@6wind.com>

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ixgbe: support flow director for X540

[Thomas Monjalon]

> > From: Mauro Annarumma <mauroannarumma@hotmail.it>
> > 
> > Flow director in X540 uses the same registers as in 82599.
> > So it just has to be enabled in the 82599 implementation.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mauro Annarumma <mauroannarumma@hotmail.it>
>
> Acked-by: Maxime Leroy <maxime.leroy@6wind.com>

Applied for version 1.6.0r2.

Thank you Mauro and Maxime.

-- 
Thomas