From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com
 [209.85.212.178]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52EBA5946
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 10:29:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id r20so445410wiv.5
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 01:33:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
 bh=Ydei5yzT2nytwAJn09OiAihxOGjygc30kEMyAWrQJjg=;
 b=KdFnRA4mBnYIqfTO73BGzJrtTvOLrQiA/2SQOPPWl+HKWnlbrw3JnNA8802DaVeaxL
 /U4v5+tOlylzXo3kK75R7a71t1jUHcPrz6ysn+nmJHUJGUdY1BPLWClbZ39SblMRwa1V
 LOSTXK4yNOTy48Rkj/7NZkzilLblJ8wLkxJCHkzP5koG6M/cCLTN64drXRf0VQytL8IP
 9sFANW+LPFivozK0WjPJcxVWBhLU0P1bk/fh7cfXLREo+KcVzFEl84XEqkatvJ+zGD3u
 UmuUlwZizcjQob67drDacexU1SMHHsRKatJdYTk6v3Er97DFNAp0QjcoPj96dwx5rvVg
 TfXA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlTyXWGuL97exYv+A+NDmQ0a+S7gv845Y8CxphICfQSjrhcSEq/c9DFpMCKhj+LoFszYGhe
X-Received: by 10.194.59.201 with SMTP id b9mr3170421wjr.43.1409214799444;
 Thu, 28 Aug 2014 01:33:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xps13.localnet (guy78-3-82-239-227-177.fbx.proxad.net.
 [82.239.227.177])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id b19sm12355833wiv.0.2014.08.28.01.33.18
 for <multiple recipients>
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Thu, 28 Aug 2014 01:33:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: "Liu, Jijiang" <jijiang.liu@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 10:33:12 +0200
Message-ID: <1786745.npCCrjnXn5@xps13>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/3.15.8-1-ARCH; KDE/4.13.3; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <1ED644BD7E0A5F4091CF203DAFB8E4CC01D631C0@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
References: <1409038294-21693-1-git-send-email-jijiang.liu@intel.com>
 <1672259.DZkGQ2cZmA@xps13>
 <1ED644BD7E0A5F4091CF203DAFB8E4CC01D631C0@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/7]i40e:support VxLAN packet
	identification
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 08:29:11 -0000

2014-08-28 01:33, Liu, Jijiang:
> > >  lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c     |   63 ++++++++++++
> > >  lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h     |   76 ++++++++++++++
> > >  lib/librte_ether/rte_ether.h      |   10 ++
> > >  lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_ethdev.c |  199
> > 
> > Changing ethdev API is so sensible that it deserves a separated commit.
> > 
> You meant that I should split the patch into two patches, one is for
> changes in librte_ether, other is for Change in librte_pmd_i40e?

Yes, 1 patch for ethdev (including rte_ether.h) and the other one for i40e.

-- 
Thomas