From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7CF6595B for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 10:08:56 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id bs8so7506894wib.17 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 01:18:54 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=12Wsu89O+nikwVTUuNQTC1GxRgnHEU3xjhyTVHC7hD8=; b=CYl0zCIxYOWOohZYN4McvCWRwVzYjgjwU7hdPg6OhFYh+wXGX9OAToIgwKME4L2t3l fMCi+L9TnJIzzc5co3iXJXRrUbjUa4ddm4Ajx4A4Lf7IvQO9gCNXU5JYsQXINHaFSXr7 VwcLBodtqy30OmzwSMeh6/e1YBHcpBGw/bQc4WhVpk0FA8Byvkt2kZQg/VBCQwDLefjz VC9fKso/5QwogCSf56bCxfW7N0bHLwMqvQ3HWQmW1MwRwhYmqOk+ANLLHV7/csFCj4k/ +elYLj3hxLNtVuDtw5hX0/obJKhA+oWf2ktPl+MRDalWFnlc9hZgp7glsOKvCLV3ZteP isGA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl/dfeagko2AldnaHVRNgGghNLgXgC6+z3W7/A5l1H43i2VePtigKI1+jCgkF2snTQW9ImF X-Received: by 10.194.95.100 with SMTP id dj4mr2000512wjb.48.1415870334663; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 01:18:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id wx3sm34724640wjc.19.2014.11.13.01.18.53 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 13 Nov 2014 01:18:53 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> To: jigsaw <jigsaw@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 10:18:36 +0100 Message-ID: <1790564.eeil24UKmd@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.2 (Linux/3.17.2-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.2; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <CAHVfvh6zLy8pGyuWw5QTKowxoZWgSH2-TpOYEVO-RXqsM9-rdQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <1415630642-3905-1-git-send-email-jigsaw@gmail.com> <1795062.hHiWS5oXJV@xps13> <CAHVfvh6zLy8pGyuWw5QTKowxoZWgSH2-TpOYEVO-RXqsM9-rdQ@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] Add in_flight_bitmask so as to use full 32 bits of tag. X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 09:08:56 -0000 2014-11-13 08:56, jigsaw: > >>Do you have another commit before this one in your tree? > > Yes this patch relies on this one: > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-November/007943.html > > Sorry I didn't make it clear. The new field usr in rte_mbuf was under same > cover letter in v2 of the in_flight_bitmask patch. > Then in_flight_bitmask has a v3 patch, but I didn't include the rte_mbuf in > the same cover letter, coz the usr patch has been ACKed. OK. In this case, you should re-submit the whole serie and add the acked-by line in the patch, and/or use the --in-reply-to option to place the v3 patch in the original thread. No need to resend it, I can manage to get the whole patchset now. Thanks -- Thomas