* [PATCH] examples/packet_ordering: fix segfault in disable_reorder mode @ 2023-12-08 12:42 Qian Hao 2023-12-11 10:51 ` [EXT] " Volodymyr Fialko 2023-12-13 10:49 ` [PATCH v2] " Qian Hao 0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Qian Hao @ 2023-12-08 12:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: dev; +Cc: Volodymyr Fialko packet_ordering example works in two modes (--disable-reorder): - When reorder is enabled: rx_thread - N*worker_thread - send_thread - When reorder is disabled: rx_thread - N*worker_thread - tx_thread N parallel worker_thread(s) generate out-of-order packets. When reorder is enabled, send_thread uses sequence number generated in rx_thread (Line 459) to enforce packet ordering. Otherwise rx_thread just sends any packet it receives. rx_thread writes sequence number into a dynamic field, which is only registered by calling rte_reorder_create() (Line 741) when reorder is enabled. However, rx_thread marks sequence number onto each packet no matter whether reorder is enabled, overwriting the leading bytes in packet mbufs when reorder is disabled, resulting in segfaults when PMD tries to DMA packets. if (!disable_reorder) {...} is added to fix the bug. --- examples/packet_ordering/main.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/examples/packet_ordering/main.c b/examples/packet_ordering/main.c index d2fd6f77e4..7688f541ba 100644 --- a/examples/packet_ordering/main.c +++ b/examples/packet_ordering/main.c @@ -455,8 +455,11 @@ rx_thread(struct rte_ring *ring_out) app_stats.rx.rx_pkts += nb_rx_pkts; /* mark sequence number */ - for (i = 0; i < nb_rx_pkts; ) - *rte_reorder_seqn(pkts[i++]) = seqn++; + if (!disable_reorder) { + for (i = 0; i < nb_rx_pkts;) { + *rte_reorder_seqn(pkts[i++]) = seqn++; + } + } /* enqueue to rx_to_workers ring */ ret = rte_ring_enqueue_burst(ring_out, -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* RE: [EXT] [PATCH] examples/packet_ordering: fix segfault in disable_reorder mode 2023-12-08 12:42 [PATCH] examples/packet_ordering: fix segfault in disable_reorder mode Qian Hao @ 2023-12-11 10:51 ` Volodymyr Fialko 2023-12-13 10:49 ` [PATCH v2] " Qian Hao 1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Volodymyr Fialko @ 2023-12-11 10:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Qian Hao, dev > -----Original Message----- > From: Qian Hao <qi_an_hao@126.com> > Sent: Friday, December 8, 2023 1:43 PM > To: dev@dpdk.org > Cc: Volodymyr Fialko <vfialko@marvell.com> > Subject: [EXT] [PATCH] examples/packet_ordering: fix segfault in disable_reorder mode <snip> Good catch overall, but few comments: 1. Please fix checkpatch coding style issues: http://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20231208124231.198138-1-qi_an_hao@126.com/ Check dpdk contributing guide to see how to run it locally: https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/contributing/patches.html#checking-the-patches 2. This patch will add if check per burst of packets (even so it will be easy to branch predict for CPU since this flag does not changes), I still think it would be better to check this condition only once before starting the rx_thread and let compiler inline the rest. So something like this: // mark rx_thread inline with explicit parameter static __rte_always_inline int rx_thread(struct rte_ring *ring_out, bool disable_reorder) // create two separate functions with baked flag static __rte_noinline int rx_thread_reorder(struct rte_ring *ring_out) { return rx_thread(ring_out, false); } static __rte_noinline int rx_thread_reorder_disabled(struct rte_ring *ring_out) { return rx_thread(ring_out, true); } // dispatch only once in main /* Start rx_thread() on the main core */ if (disable_reorder) rx_thread_reorder_disabled(rx_to_workers); else rx_thread_reorder(rx_to_workers); /Volodymyr ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] examples/packet_ordering: fix segfault in disable_reorder mode 2023-12-08 12:42 [PATCH] examples/packet_ordering: fix segfault in disable_reorder mode Qian Hao 2023-12-11 10:51 ` [EXT] " Volodymyr Fialko @ 2023-12-13 10:49 ` Qian Hao 2023-12-13 11:07 ` [PATCH v3] " Qian Hao 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Qian Hao @ 2023-12-13 10:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: dev; +Cc: vfialko The packet_ordering example works in two modes (opt via --disable-reorder): - When reorder is enabled: rx_thread - N*worker_thread - send_thread - When reorder is disabled: rx_thread - N*worker_thread - tx_thread N parallel worker_thread(s) generate out-of-order packets. When reorder is enabled, send_thread uses seq number generated in rx_thread (L459) to enforce packet ordering. Otherwise rx_thread just sends any packet it receives. rx_thread writes sequence number into a dynamic field, which is only registered by calling rte_reorder_create() (Line 741) when reorder is enabled. However, rx_thread marks sequence number onto each packet no matter whether reorder is enabled, overwriting the leading bytes in packet mbufs when reorder is disabled, resulting in segfaults when PMD tries to DMA packets. `if (!disable_reorder_flag) {...}` is added in rx_thread to fix the bug. The test is inlined by the compiler to prevent any performance loss. Signed-off-by: Qian Hao <qi_an_hao@126.com> --- examples/packet_ordering/main.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/examples/packet_ordering/main.c b/examples/packet_ordering/main.c index d2fd6f77e4..f839db9102 100644 --- a/examples/packet_ordering/main.c +++ b/examples/packet_ordering/main.c @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ #include <stdlib.h> #include <signal.h> #include <getopt.h> +#include <stdbool.h> #include <rte_eal.h> #include <rte_common.h> @@ -427,8 +428,8 @@ int_handler(int sig_num) * The mbufs are then passed to the worker threads via the rx_to_workers * ring. */ -static int -rx_thread(struct rte_ring *ring_out) +static __rte_always_inline int +rx_thread(struct rte_ring *ring_out, bool disable_reorder_flag) { uint32_t seqn = 0; uint16_t i, ret = 0; @@ -454,9 +455,11 @@ rx_thread(struct rte_ring *ring_out) } app_stats.rx.rx_pkts += nb_rx_pkts; - /* mark sequence number */ - for (i = 0; i < nb_rx_pkts; ) - *rte_reorder_seqn(pkts[i++]) = seqn++; + /* mark sequence number if reorder is enabled */ + if (!disable_reorder_flag) { + for (i = 0; i < nb_rx_pkts;) + *rte_reorder_seqn(pkts[i++]) = seqn++; + } /* enqueue to rx_to_workers ring */ ret = rte_ring_enqueue_burst(ring_out, @@ -473,6 +476,18 @@ rx_thread(struct rte_ring *ring_out) return 0; } +static __rte_noinline int +rx_thread_reorder(struct rte_ring *ring_out) +{ + return rx_thread(ring_out, false); +} + +static __rte_noinline int +rx_thread_reorder_disabled(struct rte_ring *ring_out) +{ + return rx_thread(ring_out, true); +} + /** * This thread takes bursts of packets from the rx_to_workers ring and * Changes the input port value to output port value. And feds it to @@ -772,8 +787,11 @@ main(int argc, char **argv) (void *)&send_args, last_lcore_id); } - /* Start rx_thread() on the main core */ - rx_thread(rx_to_workers); + /* Start rx_thread_xxx() on the main core */ + if (disable_reorder) + rx_thread_reorder_disabled(rx_to_workers); + else + rx_thread_reorder(rx_to_workers); RTE_LCORE_FOREACH_WORKER(lcore_id) { if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(lcore_id) < 0) -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3] examples/packet_ordering: fix segfault in disable_reorder mode 2023-12-13 10:49 ` [PATCH v2] " Qian Hao @ 2023-12-13 11:07 ` Qian Hao 2023-12-18 10:59 ` [EXT] " Volodymyr Fialko 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Qian Hao @ 2023-12-13 11:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: dev; +Cc: vfialko The packet_ordering example works in two modes (opt via --disable-reorder): - When reorder is enabled: rx_thread - N*worker_thread - send_thread - When reorder is disabled: rx_thread - N*worker_thread - tx_thread N parallel worker_thread(s) generate out-of-order packets. When reorder is enabled, send_thread uses sequence number generated in rx_thread (L459) to enforce packet ordering. Otherwise rx_thread just sends any packet it receives. rx_thread writes sequence number into a dynamic field, which is only registered by calling rte_reorder_create() (Line 741) when reorder is enabled. However, rx_thread marks sequence number onto each packet no matter whether reorder is enabled, overwriting the leading bytes in packet mbufs when reorder is disabled, resulting in segfaults when PMD tries to DMA packets. `if (!disable_reorder_flag) {...}` is added in rx_thread to fix the bug. The test is inlined by the compiler to prevent any performance loss. Signed-off-by: Qian Hao <qi_an_hao@126.com> --- examples/packet_ordering/main.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/examples/packet_ordering/main.c b/examples/packet_ordering/main.c index d2fd6f77e4..f839db9102 100644 --- a/examples/packet_ordering/main.c +++ b/examples/packet_ordering/main.c @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ #include <stdlib.h> #include <signal.h> #include <getopt.h> +#include <stdbool.h> #include <rte_eal.h> #include <rte_common.h> @@ -427,8 +428,8 @@ int_handler(int sig_num) * The mbufs are then passed to the worker threads via the rx_to_workers * ring. */ -static int -rx_thread(struct rte_ring *ring_out) +static __rte_always_inline int +rx_thread(struct rte_ring *ring_out, bool disable_reorder_flag) { uint32_t seqn = 0; uint16_t i, ret = 0; @@ -454,9 +455,11 @@ rx_thread(struct rte_ring *ring_out) } app_stats.rx.rx_pkts += nb_rx_pkts; - /* mark sequence number */ - for (i = 0; i < nb_rx_pkts; ) - *rte_reorder_seqn(pkts[i++]) = seqn++; + /* mark sequence number if reorder is enabled */ + if (!disable_reorder_flag) { + for (i = 0; i < nb_rx_pkts;) + *rte_reorder_seqn(pkts[i++]) = seqn++; + } /* enqueue to rx_to_workers ring */ ret = rte_ring_enqueue_burst(ring_out, @@ -473,6 +476,18 @@ rx_thread(struct rte_ring *ring_out) return 0; } +static __rte_noinline int +rx_thread_reorder(struct rte_ring *ring_out) +{ + return rx_thread(ring_out, false); +} + +static __rte_noinline int +rx_thread_reorder_disabled(struct rte_ring *ring_out) +{ + return rx_thread(ring_out, true); +} + /** * This thread takes bursts of packets from the rx_to_workers ring and * Changes the input port value to output port value. And feds it to @@ -772,8 +787,11 @@ main(int argc, char **argv) (void *)&send_args, last_lcore_id); } - /* Start rx_thread() on the main core */ - rx_thread(rx_to_workers); + /* Start rx_thread_xxx() on the main core */ + if (disable_reorder) + rx_thread_reorder_disabled(rx_to_workers); + else + rx_thread_reorder(rx_to_workers); RTE_LCORE_FOREACH_WORKER(lcore_id) { if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(lcore_id) < 0) -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* RE: [EXT] [PATCH v3] examples/packet_ordering: fix segfault in disable_reorder mode 2023-12-13 11:07 ` [PATCH v3] " Qian Hao @ 2023-12-18 10:59 ` Volodymyr Fialko 2024-03-07 8:22 ` Thomas Monjalon 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Volodymyr Fialko @ 2023-12-18 10:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Qian Hao, dev > -----Original Message----- > From: Qian Hao <qi_an_hao@126.com> > Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2023 12:07 PM > To: dev@dpdk.org > Cc: Volodymyr Fialko <vfialko@marvell.com> > Subject: [EXT] [PATCH v3] examples/packet_ordering: fix segfault in disable_reorder mode > > External Email > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > The packet_ordering example works in two modes (opt via --disable-reorder): > - When reorder is enabled: rx_thread - N*worker_thread - send_thread > - When reorder is disabled: rx_thread - N*worker_thread - tx_thread N parallel worker_thread(s) > generate out-of-order packets. > > When reorder is enabled, send_thread uses sequence number generated in rx_thread (L459) to > enforce packet ordering. Otherwise rx_thread just sends any packet it receives. > > rx_thread writes sequence number into a dynamic field, which is only registered by calling > rte_reorder_create() (Line 741) when reorder is enabled. However, rx_thread marks sequence > number onto each packet no matter whether reorder is enabled, overwriting the leading bytes in > packet mbufs when reorder is disabled, resulting in segfaults when PMD tries to DMA packets. > > `if (!disable_reorder_flag) {...}` is added in rx_thread to fix the bug. > The test is inlined by the compiler to prevent any performance loss. > > Signed-off-by: Qian Hao <qi_an_hao@126.com> > --- > examples/packet_ordering/main.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > Acked-by: Volodymyr Fialko <vfialko@marvell.com> /Volodymyr ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [EXT] [PATCH v3] examples/packet_ordering: fix segfault in disable_reorder mode 2023-12-18 10:59 ` [EXT] " Volodymyr Fialko @ 2024-03-07 8:22 ` Thomas Monjalon 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2024-03-07 8:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Qian Hao; +Cc: dev, Volodymyr Fialko > > The packet_ordering example works in two modes (opt via --disable-reorder): > > - When reorder is enabled: rx_thread - N*worker_thread - send_thread > > - When reorder is disabled: rx_thread - N*worker_thread - tx_thread N parallel worker_thread(s) > > generate out-of-order packets. > > > > When reorder is enabled, send_thread uses sequence number generated in rx_thread (L459) to > > enforce packet ordering. Otherwise rx_thread just sends any packet it receives. > > > > rx_thread writes sequence number into a dynamic field, which is only registered by calling > > rte_reorder_create() (Line 741) when reorder is enabled. However, rx_thread marks sequence > > number onto each packet no matter whether reorder is enabled, overwriting the leading bytes in > > packet mbufs when reorder is disabled, resulting in segfaults when PMD tries to DMA packets. > > > > `if (!disable_reorder_flag) {...}` is added in rx_thread to fix the bug. > > The test is inlined by the compiler to prevent any performance loss. > > > > Signed-off-by: Qian Hao <qi_an_hao@126.com> > > Acked-by: Volodymyr Fialko <vfialko@marvell.com> Applied, thanks. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-03-07 8:22 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2023-12-08 12:42 [PATCH] examples/packet_ordering: fix segfault in disable_reorder mode Qian Hao 2023-12-11 10:51 ` [EXT] " Volodymyr Fialko 2023-12-13 10:49 ` [PATCH v2] " Qian Hao 2023-12-13 11:07 ` [PATCH v3] " Qian Hao 2023-12-18 10:59 ` [EXT] " Volodymyr Fialko 2024-03-07 8:22 ` Thomas Monjalon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).