From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.ecotelecom.ru (mail.ecotelecom.ru [193.105.59.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87C1C5913 for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 14:11:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from stand.localnet (unknown [10.210.0.221]) by mail.ecotelecom.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5F43AD4029C for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 16:11:02 +0300 (MSK) From: Sergey Balabanov To: dev Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 16:11:01 +0300 Message-ID: <1798136.BiEt3LMkbp@stand> Organization: Ecotelecom User-Agent: KMail/5.0.2 (Linux/4.2.0-18-generic; KDE/5.15.0; x86_64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: [dpdk-dev] Bond port with multiple queues X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 13:11:02 -0000 Hello, I configured a bond port with 2 rx queues on it and added 2 slaves into the bond port. When I run traffic I get all packets on queue #0. This is quite expected when RSS turned off. When I turn on RSS all packets are distributed between two rx queues. There is no guarantee that I will get all packets from the slave port #0 on some queue and all packets from the slave port #1 on another queue. Does anybody know is there a way to configure bond port in a way when all traffic on port #0 goes to queue #0 and traffic on port #1 goes to queue #1? Thanks, Sergey Balabanov