DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, <matan@nvidia.com>, <rasland@nvidia.com>,
	<orika@nvidia.com>, Ray Kinsella <mdr@ashroe.eu>,
	<ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>, <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	<akhil.goyal@nxp.com>, <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>,
	<ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
	<olivier.matz@6wind.com>, <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
	<david.marchand@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net: announce changes in TCP header
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 12:02:54 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <17b1ab37630.281a.45678ef996719ac36a921b5e5b2e03f7@oktetlabs.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1640281.NIGIfqfGR8@thomas>

The patch lacks motivation. Why is the change required? Why is it useful?

On August 5, 2021 18:28:31 Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:

> Nobody rejected this change but there is not enough ack
> to make it an accepted announce of change.
>
> 02/08/2021 12:42, Gregory Etelson:
>> Announce change to add a union that will provide byte and bitfield
>> access to TCP flags.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>> +* net: structure ``rte_tcp_hdr`` will have a union that will provide
>> +  byte access to existing ``tcp_flags`` and add a bitfield for TCP flags.


  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-06  9:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-02 10:42 Gregory Etelson
2021-08-02 12:09 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2021-08-05 15:28 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-08-06  9:02   ` Andrew Rybchenko [this message]
2021-08-06 13:56     ` Gregory Etelson
2023-06-29 16:48       ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=17b1ab37630.281a.45678ef996719ac36a921b5e5b2e03f7@oktetlabs.ru \
    --to=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
    --cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
    --cc=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=getelson@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=matan@nvidia.com \
    --cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=orika@nvidia.com \
    --cc=rasland@nvidia.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).