From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas@monjalon.net>
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34CC35951
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 10:48:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41])
 by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63B3520C89;
 Tue, 25 Apr 2017 04:48:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160])
 by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 25 Apr 2017 04:48:38 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h=
 cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to
 :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender
 :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=I8dUsjKQ8CRsbaL
 dj+qGbKF02BXdHaj8lwBBPrN1G5k=; b=UZWPE4ZAkE+Srj4DxhCHPyojvwmMKQ9
 dDRAEyLVXHzRto6j+lEVgO5oP2RFVfpKgV2mGPu2N9fm3S5lsbpbtnl99x3FnTp8
 cG82CmgrsJxuADq620cZqG8GzTnHakZc+bQ/vF3mw/3oGL7JFKniN8wOlTxdCxqI
 4w0mzzmepLi0=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type
 :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
 :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=
 fm1; bh=I8dUsjKQ8CRsbaLdj+qGbKF02BXdHaj8lwBBPrN1G5k=; b=fJ23T1sV
 /Etcxf3orli+oCwGW+ar/88oh95c9bt6a3SFDZbGaFVQDcICpEs3EAxjy8EwZ99N
 A6hL0aBztpwU85e8Kdvh9Ppv5/wyOzbOViJRWie3s/eam+35lM5CMtZvt4nOX6OA
 bgtOUH/6I57y+po1C5F0wnwf81eNvjAvU5Atd30FvIa0pdkERyEnedcqqFPdiShd
 mICnPSkNa9NfqOkhSGptyX6puCU+aeKn1/7kgGtA4KaIJBSGGaO1WcL2fv5lX7AU
 w9BoojDK2GmAeOdOX7GoWSq0slGif9Lt7OCaS1t737EJJkATqu0iaRtg0J1LQmXE
 9D9xqy6i86UPlg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:Zg3_WEe12UhWmL-RYgfPorP7eZl3DzqlaN2sjsdSfaESUj55mJkqvw>
X-Sasl-enc: BpHyC6jGQYWLuHmoU0pA5BfGMcpPxchn+2skQ2G+HvKk 1493110118
Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184])
 by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 065347E0EE;
 Tue, 25 Apr 2017 04:48:38 -0400 (EDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Andriy Berestovskyy <Andriy.Berestovskyy@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 10:48:37 +0200
Message-ID: <1810447.5BRUVpxoUJ@xps>
In-Reply-To: <1490962860-11567-1-git-send-email-Andriy.Berestovskyy@caviumnetworks.com>
References: <1490962860-11567-1-git-send-email-Andriy.Berestovskyy@caviumnetworks.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] usertools: use /sys/devices/system/cpu for
	CPU layout script
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 08:48:39 -0000

Hi,

31/03/2017 14:21, Andriy Berestovskyy:
> Some platforms do not have core/socket info in /proc/cpuinfo.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andriy Berestovskyy <Andriy.Berestovskyy@caviumnetworks.com>
> ---
>  usertools/cpu_layout.py | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

Applied, thanks for improving this script.

Do you think it is really a good idea to keep and maintain this script
in DPDK? It was intentionnally not exported in "make install".
I think it is a bit out of scope, and I wonder which alternatives
do we have? I know hwloc/lstopo, but there are probably others.