From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com (mail-wm0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4668FBA3 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 16:19:43 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f53.google.com with SMTP id f82so133542365wmf.1 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 07:19:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Zfv6iGcGST+HVe1/rdg45BgIXbzfFSBX7+9lpLyHWrg=; b=RY3o3dgNISp9O9OIWTyqksUaCyIKAkRPwLYKl81YsfHDABBTgRTiAz19dZWJfnf7Jl ev+JC9VugksjcTPi9HHfnkRkupKs8rWrzGgSebmS4fsnLjaorVld9KYcFS1a3kIe3Ax6 mPBbGH0QOTBP+8xoHEY1NvIbk7cvpWK6OmvGt/b4nmyeQosFS4Ju2hoS8WTTd6hY0A2U +EzoDgGDcLcuCBe7LnO0D+zSyTa9QAglIBhO5JJwwoU0zsbRNC6v6iKnjju148neCr4u B+kLvylFmD7BtVVUvwoQ6tjIKUHQEI1gzEKWmGLfdZ1HJSo/1ibedmFJfVojOTv8uIsO xJKg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Zfv6iGcGST+HVe1/rdg45BgIXbzfFSBX7+9lpLyHWrg=; b=gDCPDQqhHxjr5ZtqqOPALiCTUPZCnfnTnZSU6eMYgZpsk5PeNNNaUMCWHqZ9/ngRlt UtZmppvEpgmTtv2E/F11Srfqc9lvyho6a/Eo/7TM5pVcmUlZply2f1SNeZ1RU/6MOsih POHKTxVrYOzDe3adY+7OJMHmSDcVgj+/ei2H/ILCoqnma+OyojKH7eIhC5hlEgOxgrlJ EvHlvedssexTuLu4ArkcZf1rr86IRhpFay68RS191574tS7HoZ7IJHVRmL1TRyNr9agA iMkFsUk5STq7c1sUDl+JLnWoLXyKdVnnuRLG1JNxrcKuJlABJlm1A18v7aZAYeZtkBtu 7BRQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJBV3y15G6XIDQe4yRSg3AbDGEzY3qeMTC0darSH/FkCX4/SQelibK3e0A7VzEv0rp0 X-Received: by 10.28.133.143 with SMTP id h137mr396252wmd.58.1482247183656; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 07:19:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.8.100] ([80.215.212.250]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x7sm26073148wjp.18.2016.12.20.07.19.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Dec 2016 07:19:42 -0800 (PST) To: Ferruh Yigit , dev@dpdk.org References: <20161216143919.4909-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> <20161216190257.6921-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> <20161216190257.6921-19-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> <716260c7-4120-9984-3c46-02ad50b11a94@6wind.com> <625f5a53-e51e-7fb0-b477-c452e9217f41@intel.com> Cc: Jingjing Wu , Helin Zhang , Wenzhuo Lu , Chen Jing D , Bernard Iremonger From: Vincent JARDIN Organization: www.6wind.com Message-ID: <1812ab01-ee86-f160-3f9b-6e807a909237@6wind.com> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 16:19:40 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <625f5a53-e51e-7fb0-b477-c452e9217f41@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 18/29] app/testpmd: use VFD APIs on i40e X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 15:19:44 -0000 Le 19/12/2016 à 12:03, Ferruh Yigit a écrit : > And it is always possible to move these into ethdev layer, when multiple > PMDs supports same feature. > I agree this is something that needs to keep an eye on it, and be sure > if an API is generic, move it into eth_dev layer. you are right, you have a good point, it is better to try this approach, and let's generalize later. thank you for your comments, Vincent