From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f41.google.com (mail-wm0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C3912BA8 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2016 18:08:44 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f41.google.com with SMTP id t79so133580532wmt.0 for ; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 09:08:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zHagP9hHnmxINvYIdUhlhN5FSi4aPx8oN9Rvb8NOOFk=; b=NoFon0E6o13Ls9ALXRQRoRAqG0oVUpp1qjGEm+lYRFsGiRvxqhkKgXDew8CJbImu+E Sba2GxbOQ8dzSIVIefvU/5e3leaWnMt6UPo1dkCpfI4Z4RQqi46xYldaFN93e0GWvSPM CIIxSRtoPwO+Bows63xxonTsFkiBxYF8Vef702C2qofxNAIR0IL85gPtPy4NgAKAkLPH FrYE8xjdDyg7re4oGfwLknfCFs0A5lKW1hRKa8M5BgM7R2Q7Y0VC/UJqLuUJBNo973xJ C3gwOec1r4fjAf7nw/U4zQv80cWql2WIyDukmtwS8gOmFfhbXQNrh7VxoMp0scviAagq OBMA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zHagP9hHnmxINvYIdUhlhN5FSi4aPx8oN9Rvb8NOOFk=; b=JXAd79jg9V/42objI0V/7MaFp91rduV+JgiXcxC/p70Yh1PETX+sYCWVBLYKKoC54H lM7MDTFa+Prlm7uMP/c2fMas6/NkLSu/8HRMiYZrAfnXmGdDqWm8IzBaox2YasVHqYup 9kU4DP6RHeSgZ0CyIzXf79hcm/Urxdg30bNzZ4DkX/aQFv2R0lm1ukeGn6CGechzRxOr 6H2jgx6sfEI0trvz9fsFBYeor8SfR8Bjk/0Yb7UY7XTHIJsow+2/1/GOGOIYQ6dKqX9W UDPHiTvhXeaockG9qHeT+tn4SB+/ewcTZIm3sh/wqE1EtGOyNsKVM5bdqzQeH6epy4dU X/lA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC01/2fEL7eWCI1MVUbJFcb0o2nNRB18SXpinsm5jdPEO/0hO23uI0z4jDnWbgLgGu6+a X-Received: by 10.28.32.150 with SMTP id g144mr3786480wmg.46.1481044123869; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 09:08:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c202sm5418971wme.1.2016.12.06.09.08.42 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 06 Dec 2016 09:08:43 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Baruch Siach Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Mcnamara, John" , Olivier Matz Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 18:08:42 +0100 Message-ID: <1815752.S474otfYhx@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <824b47fc043902610646e26a8b053199620744da.1481012725.git.baruch@tkos.co.il> <20161206111105.g6u2bjbhcgnl5kfs@tarshish> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: correct description of attach to indirect mbuf X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 17:08:44 -0000 > > > Thanks, please keep the doc fixes coming. > > > > > > It would be better to quote the function in fixed width text like: > > > ``rte_pktmbuf_attach()``. > > > > None of the function names mentioned in this chapter are quoted. I can > > post a fix for that, but I think it should be a separate patch. > > > > Unfortunately, the documentation isn't very consistent in this. You can > ignore it for this patch. > > Acked-by: John McNamara Applied, thanks