From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas@monjalon.net>
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3605F234
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 10 May 2017 15:02:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41])
 by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8273A20931;
 Wed, 10 May 2017 09:02:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160])
 by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 10 May 2017 09:02:52 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h=
 cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to
 :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender
 :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=5UicieLC3SGw82x
 7JnhZxx7Hxy6xvFzodrUKFeYYclM=; b=fxeubslCNgkaUt9YpSTs8jm4ibH2jly
 e1HLXdW2QRLUXi2JtSjAFvZoK4BJQExVeSO3IljXeAllZRC4Y8qKJdC2U8E1UjRB
 78NH324BYrrFB88j+vdEK2ELrqtjhE4XAmSjltLgMGYxq3M3bqg88Tk/6qF6JVSY
 r9tHsfnsYfZs=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type
 :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
 :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=
 fm1; bh=5UicieLC3SGw82x7JnhZxx7Hxy6xvFzodrUKFeYYclM=; b=KvDR75m1
 cJQWznbi4oY+hHTJ/obrfOo1IWr7FRuZryVJpe8KDtJG86yWjVTj0yKMzNm9vdwe
 dRvLYopko0SUn20ga+ogyuM1faQ52OFJzoje68xIwlkFLrVNlKJ8cpOnPMwQ+q4/
 i1RkY76gTFeXs0o4/y+IMfc7gqX0eflTRmVzqHm4bq3NsJp6Qb15TJ5uZYULGKe9
 JZRFSI/id+AmmZDZY5Iix+Di2r5yx0/SyDNoFKmRrNJix8UsfM4tJJA7/ASEl3Zd
 nf0I3ZM3b/oliysRgmofwrvOo+kd+8kSmvu7aiC90EvqQ4achltPfKjTsGn4c5TE
 4Kjv0zkvyd2YlA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:fA8TWesvTdv-zGuPU-8b2Enj5hUizazRuGqofd8XklimfncJKKjtTw>
X-Sasl-enc: DGgducfYITVTgXvv+bL9MdqtUjBzivl3Db+b7NWgNLyu 1494421372
Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184])
 by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 328807E86A;
 Wed, 10 May 2017 09:02:52 -0400 (EDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Gaetan Rivet <gaetan.rivet@6wind.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 15:02:51 +0200
Message-ID: <18235008.tfIFGzLugk@xps>
In-Reply-To: <4b1edeb12ff61bdb04a0189be30395589c713dbb.1494420483.git.gaetan.rivet@6wind.com>
References: <4b1edeb12ff61bdb04a0189be30395589c713dbb.1494420483.git.gaetan.rivet@6wind.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] pci: deprecate PCI detach
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 13:02:53 -0000

10/05/2017 14:52, Gaetan Rivet:
> This patch deprecates the function rte_eal_pci_detach in 17.05,
> which will be removed in 17.08.
> 
> The generic detach bus method should be used instead.

Can we wait to have a new generic detach method for deprecating this one?