From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 121EC42FA5; Mon, 31 Jul 2023 16:08:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE1ED40A89; Mon, 31 Jul 2023 16:08:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 594094067B for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2023 16:08:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40B2232007F9; Mon, 31 Jul 2023 10:08:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 31 Jul 2023 10:08:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t= 1690812513; x=1690898913; bh=gkQI/1cFr3TR7dzxCeiboSwfkiP1B2EB92z pT5g9J2U=; b=U5qdwheyLbhUZcebAuxY+pNWZklkZmbcoaZ7U/nmUAgXn0ZTGEY T6YznpcHkxLSj7xxoSOsG3QR1Nm9eyviNSyCypMPvO24seQo8HKlszRyABIwfBc0 OxAnTS77SV3wA/ox1BACXLA31bbOFIEjHePdOzsHHFUTIVAxACc6yy9IvtLuinKK uTPk5xIWkqPd991Xl2si+UbvXdqV4bNAkBqZ9ahgUofApduxw+HdhUXcJrQ9DAa1 ts+L29K3u5pkYtDaslRMhSTTR8Ekn3GU8Hda/tzHkSlAjPyjYvd6PahLx6vWMFRj HuDPmafCzn/7N1AGb/3dOpiYdGEyspBKJJw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t= 1690812513; x=1690898913; bh=gkQI/1cFr3TR7dzxCeiboSwfkiP1B2EB92z pT5g9J2U=; b=gs7B0VWKFsWjFfzQoKCyf0nwAmYx1gF1zvYS3eryJTt4V9LP6iw YlXA8Q2poDFVmtKNIktDjmiKGRRgAKlt/GBcAHV9HTu361El9VBG4okYilzRKmc+ 9O/udsCac1IwkkQzLEkS76IBiJ7acONXdCSFFp5a+VZ+nDrSAjFVKTL0ozozMXqw ne+3I4+s3iH6n1JxITNpnRgaLxnEu753AACgzc+CqV/Hzz44YnT1iJUgpAfplh/d L2VYBKfpHRIDNt+QkO0o5/VhMsBUDOGeFrx9JLwWaNGuMJw07zXuKQ9KUhxK8a8G 35XfBCwoOPPRgYV7ejFWqY/w7VoQOUk4SCQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedviedrjeeggdeglecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvfevufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnheptdejieeifeehtdffgfdvleetueeffeehueejgfeuteeftddtieek gfekudehtdfgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrh homhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 31 Jul 2023 10:08:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Yanling Song Cc: dev@dpdk.org, yanling.song@linux.dev, dev@dpdk.org, yanggan@ramaxel.com, xuyun@ramaxel.com, stephen@networkplumber.org, lihuisong@huawei.com, Ziyang Xuan , Xiaoyun Wang , Guoyang Zhou , Hemant Agrawal , Ferruh Yigit Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/26] Net/SPNIC: support SPNIC into DPDK 22.03 Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2023 16:08:29 +0200 Message-ID: <1825565.QCnGb9OGeP@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20220218173029.0000798b@ramaxel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org 13/04/2023 11:02, Ferruh Yigit: > On 2/18/2022 9:30 AM, Yanling Song wrote: > > On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 19:07:09 +0100 > > Thomas Monjalon wrote: > >> If you don't want to keep a copyright, don't copy the code. > >> > > Got it. We will modify the code to meet the requirement of community > > and upstream it again. Since the change is great, I'm afraid that the > > new code maybe cannot meet the schedule of 22.03. > > Hi Yanling, > > What is the status of the driver? Will there be a new version? It seems this patch was abandoned. Anyway it was a lot of copy/pasting from hinic driver without keeping the copyright. Tell us in case I say something wrong.