From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 516B7A00C5; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 08:52:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAAC71D8CC; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 08:52:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B3551D739 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 08:52:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59DD75C006F; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 02:52:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 30 Apr 2020 02:52:38 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= X2CMiNpilqU+rtYNjID9YDkYmbMnReCfwq0NQZLMqpE=; b=LlNNG3W3UOUlSPop WVy3wH1wMCsFf6oOHsE/xTROzzIUmgN4gA0bkGitZdtemKeQlVoDtQeUpvdkJUU7 VSGzaqRylVcolIhw7nflcKytFcuW12l1FbzGHeuo7PlggdiXxWqfymLCyvF2FLuQ KCcC8fOF7zAb/OEH5umIkAEQjJxt0PRiJJ1OIPuw26SMOYdulKiNO96ijSEHUGrQ V2mJl+Qzkipj0+//pesSDiCqYl7q1DDoiLjJl1NgT5iDmpfCeT8MlFqu/lV9aGoI uxd5NrIsT/KaQEtxORqlzcAB+zPRHD8KMi3JUZ+1nmpsy0Hh+iLwkomFmobQhFuh h13zuw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=X2CMiNpilqU+rtYNjID9YDkYmbMnReCfwq0NQZLMq pE=; b=bKzwEsE/1DTkgNmxSRzLNoDiIpDAIUjaIAZ0t+j2XLIEgZ5v05nFk6yjP jAoRxOtJrH3nGukQbQ67wbPszph101chhMmDyJrEm22utHR8bckNCD1rqt6N6aFx 33kyJdXR+HdtKSaZaeT6tCXCf3MtKB5uPs7crZsYRluyy9T6maqY0Eo6aav63wVI FcNeS0RaSupclK1QyH6ZhOs1kgimHFCSIhXyNlhHcv9vJNNu02GML5swNUld1Fvp 9iGbFSjnfzDJPhpFBfYNeaRvTM8XAY4ynk9Mcvm9R3Fxu2aA/17cNrTSxpiVIK3N c1ykf/VCFeUQMRbcI2Hx2spk++e4A== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrieeggdduudduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepueeufeejtdeftddvhfffiefgteeulefgleeuudeikeekhfdtgeff hfdttdelvdetnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtghomhdpmhhitghrohhsohhfth drtghomhenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihii vgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonh drnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 58838328005E; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 02:52:37 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Pallavi Kadam Cc: dev@dpdk.org, ranjit.menon@intel.com, Harini.Ramakrishnan@microsoft.com, Narcisa.Vasile@microsoft.com, dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com, tbashar@mellanox.com Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 08:52:35 +0200 Message-ID: <1826663.L1bRAqqpGC@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20200429232427.7112-3-pallavi.kadam@intel.com> References: <20200429232427.7112-1-pallavi.kadam@intel.com> <20200429232427.7112-3-pallavi.kadam@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] eal: add fnmatch implementation on Windows X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 30/04/2020 01:24, Pallavi Kadam: > Added fnmatch implementation on Windows to support > log level arguments. > The source file is with BSD-3-Clause license. > https://github.com/lattera/freebsd/blob/master/usr.bin/csup/fnmatch.c Sorry for the naive question, I don't know Windows programming. Do we really need this external code? Why RtlIsNameInExpression from Windows cannot be used? https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/devnotes/rtlisnameinexpression