DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Cc: "akhil.goyal@nxp.com" <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>,
	"Dharmappa, Savinay" <savinay.dharmappa@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"david.marchand@redhat.com" <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
	"Iremonger, Bernard" <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] test/ipsec: measure libipsec performance
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 13:49:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1827889.yKVeVyVuyW@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR11MB3301EA77473E6D4D39FCDCEC9AD50@BYAPR11MB3301.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

21/04/2020 13:07, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> > 21/04/2020 12:21, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> > > > 21/04/2020 04:29, Thomas Monjalon:
> > > > > > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > > > > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > > > > > @@ -1259,6 +1259,8 @@ F: lib/librte_ipsec/
> > > > > >  M: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
> > > > > >  F: app/test/test_ipsec.c
> > > > > >  F: doc/guides/prog_guide/ipsec_lib.rst
> > > > > > +M: Savinay Dharmappa <savinay.dharmappa@intel.com>
> > > > > > +F: app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c
> > > > > >  M: Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
> > > > > >  F: app/test/test_ipsec_sad.c
> > > > > >  F: app/test-sad/
> > > > >
> > > > > Repeating what I said on v3:
> > > > > Having one different maintainer per test file is quite ridiculous.
> > > > > The maintainers of a lib are expected to maintain the related tests.
> > [...]
> > > About having separate MAINTAINER for the test -
> > > honestly I don't understand why it is a problem for you.
> > > Obviously we would like to spread the load - what's wrong with it?
> > 
> > This is a problem of ownership.
> > Maintaining a library means you take care of every aspect, including tests.
> > That's why I would like to see you as a global maintainer of IPsec.
> > 
> > It doesn't prevent you to delegate workload, of course.
> > But at the end it is more convenient to know there is a limited number
> > of persons responsible for the global quality of a component,
> > a person which is accountable and answering questions on the topic,
> > no matter which exact file we are talking about.
> 
> Just talked with Bernard, he kindly agreed to be a maintainer for all ipsec UT:
> app/test/test_ipsec*
> Hope that will fulfil your concern?

My concern was to have the library maintainer maintaining also the related tests.
I don't understand why you don't want to take this responsibility,
but I cannot force you.
Having only one maintainer for IPsec tests is better than the current situation.



  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-21 11:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-02 10:53 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] app: test: " Savinay Dharmappa
2020-03-02 11:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Savinay Dharmappa
2020-03-02 12:51   ` David Marchand
2020-03-02 14:40   ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-03-03 15:34   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-03-05  7:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Savinay Dharmappa
2020-03-05 11:45     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-03-05 17:11       ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-03-05 22:51         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-03-06  8:58           ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-03-10 13:24             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-03-10 20:14               ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-03-06  7:08     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] test/ipsec: " Savinay Dharmappa
2020-04-19 21:43       ` Akhil Goyal
2020-04-21  2:29       ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-21  2:35         ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-21 10:21           ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-21 10:28             ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-21 11:07               ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-21 11:49                 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2020-04-21 12:04                   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-21 12:58                     ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-23 15:25       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " Savinay Dharmappa
2020-04-24 10:06         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-05-09 21:46           ` Akhil Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1827889.yKVeVyVuyW@thomas \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
    --cc=bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=savinay.dharmappa@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).