From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wr0-f174.google.com (mail-wr0-f174.google.com
 [209.85.128.174]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72EF15911
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 17:52:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-wr0-f174.google.com with SMTP id 89so25420288wrr.3
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 08:52:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to
 :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=XVZbMAv6SyytVZ20ycMMNYf4QLjDx/t4X6Slo3MZJb0=;
 b=ThPn4qajL900ZDPlLg90z8fKDoWHIKPxQOj96EUBWO+BnCjVT8T/izJYG4n8lvewGL
 AUwO2ifGLT4ubK/YsI8G69THFmV0U/EmGy1VbVsc1v21izDryFvNFP5ID7R/jeDGuWwt
 Od59nPFetMWimGgKJ2JfF6KBgQSFAmp5qvdSuP65c1dOxIhoG4sz2yATZKm3ig5xMsZ3
 Wq4O/4LhP6LpuXPYXTp/4FQI8Vb/nw8QKBNmlUAkGVuy7ZCjKpHQuAB1Nx7MC5gWbU57
 A8qp2S5chZWweixuGfskLinbjmybTC62/Nym/Of12JBPEANKpE5rcghHzMaDpAaAbRmY
 IRpw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent
 :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=XVZbMAv6SyytVZ20ycMMNYf4QLjDx/t4X6Slo3MZJb0=;
 b=WPAnDPQNvXIVE7KE2YvSJBcRwc9hwDCjXZP56qQA8C84nbswuwMGimasmG2bFz/T4q
 SckudN/HXL8/ASlI1gQB5CN++qKEgjiaxN148/xBQPwXf+3BOVCMbpJswuYaXEQXd4D6
 6vASnu9iKfOO9+LgiQDYCyKMv88e2dvCEwLWkzxkQNlOjqajuaOlFz7zT0zQBXyUPCQ2
 nLNB5MqBf+Xs+s995ls1RD1vDdwyQRiPa9tWZqfvICVpi30b5YbN2eOu1HNDRvFH5y1f
 c21QTLveeJK2ZvUDQ//f+wNQFNq95Zy/7Je1zWcTcg4jLUZYzCmW9a4AJCacUNeabepc
 uuWg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39kLC4dX6US8bgiKazSAo0eWTzSh9/tzgDM0WHyVigo+EEIwSaRdP00UENgsjh6PzwK2
X-Received: by 10.223.128.231 with SMTP id 94mr28315668wrl.165.1487868746157; 
 Thu, 23 Feb 2017 08:52:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xps13.localnet (187.21.90.92.rev.sfr.net. [92.90.21.187])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b8sm4058256wrb.9.2017.02.23.08.52.25
 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Thu, 23 Feb 2017 08:52:25 -0800 (PST)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
Cc: "Trahe, Fiona" <fiona.trahe@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org,
 Pankaj Joshi <pankaj.joshi63@gmail.com>, users@dpdk.org
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 17:43:16 +0100
Message-ID: <1834186.BtXV0yjv0z@xps13>
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <E115CCD9D858EF4F90C690B0DCB4D897476E1582@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <CAOYs48EOA4mWyYWHgBDmcSExowPY3JNMSpUhFKexBuAysB42kw@mail.gmail.com>
 <5068483.Xs10W06zQs@xps13>
 <E115CCD9D858EF4F90C690B0DCB4D897476E1582@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-users] Problem running dpdk-qat example in
	SR-IOV mode
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 16:52:26 -0000

2017-02-23 16:18, De Lara Guarch, Pablo:
> > From: Thomas Monjalon
> > 2017-02-20 11:53, Trahe, Fiona:
> > > The dpdk-qat example app is an earlier mechanism of wrapping a QAT
> > driver into DPDK - it's not using the cryptodev API, and depends on both a
> > kernel driver and user-space libs from a QAT package.
> > > Unless you have a really good reason for using this (like you wanted to
> > use the older Cave Creek device) I would recommend you use the cryptodev
> > API.
> > 
> > Could we remove this obsolete example?
> 
> This is a good point. How can we proceed with this? As it is a sample application,
> does it require a deprecation notice?

I don't think so.
You just have to send a patch.
Thanks