From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com (mail-wm0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BA3CFE5 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 08:37:02 +0100 (CET) Received: by wmeg8 with SMTP id g8so52733571wme.1 for ; Sun, 01 Nov 2015 23:37:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind_com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=uz2S93ZT0u7EGj5/63R6b13qz7JBcbvOXfqE05GdqC4=; b=BQKwWNIPLFVBI7PxNrYpwQd6zCQD2OyC2MPa7Fy7LXiJc6QmDMnA2MpFqua0iKtUs1 P7gBb7hY+VsBMpkx3g40A8X4zSDvgXGWof684AY+U4TUEuEvH6sZYxM/vO/nePRdWx0r +xCyNHj1Sz3lHWH0BxRscps0jm1wGFR9B1UFQH6MwsAhteWiRwxaVZFdI/ElKi7nQd4h JnyPPzFnoiLnHxtCV2lnc/jyaSQaLAb8wtzd/groIfwQP+00WGxctNx16uHubN05P6D+ +WybNRKMxQnAMnD6RNliDGQ6hzAHTExoS2/xrR8GYxLx816QzunQoaA58yB+esJiH7NB rNwg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=uz2S93ZT0u7EGj5/63R6b13qz7JBcbvOXfqE05GdqC4=; b=EzYVOUCMO93T4CpqrBNZpbAb2bdXqUJWs32arBmO6RxCwh4F5t4AxHI4CksbKXqa6c Br7yA7EbPKzR5VMyM1+7dbC9xDxX8nR4TwO1GTgQrhYq7oyAdGnZS8tCoS91ofNB0+Ms Cbw+AW7++4hjhAa3rnghTEDYd5pmxV0+W03iDyVx0/O+XIneN4k6J4+nFNngkGxhdqFu /2yzCfHD9ucUewyXcnlUnuxjodWM5rzGHFYZYcz+7O6o0p9cwktNRcgGjuf+f3BMxOid 1HhJDWQQa1wGNhjI+hev9pM0NXXt4LwiWE72YsAVvlux0Q1eX0cAUqS4bG7u9EnbfQxl aURA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnFiMAtnhU2r0RSscPUdcPq3YErtMCS/tBN3l9i41B8O6vnqkcpo24SAU1GDdr2FojB9TWi X-Received: by 10.28.145.145 with SMTP id t139mr12844949wmd.0.1446449821879; Sun, 01 Nov 2015 23:37:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (144.16.90.92.rev.sfr.net. [92.90.16.144]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r12sm16531708wmd.17.2015.11.01.23.37.00 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 01 Nov 2015 23:37:01 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Iremonger, Bernard" Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 08:35:44 +0100 Message-ID: <1846921.aMtNxlC2Q7@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <533710CFB86FA344BFBF2D6802E6028621B5A5E8@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <533710CFB86FA344BFBF2D6802E6028621B5A5E8@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 00/28] remove pci driver from vdevs X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 07:37:02 -0000 2015-11-02 05:28, Qiu, Michael: > Hi, Bernard > > Could we merge some patch together? I see lots of patches are simple and > doing the same thing but in different NIC, merge them almost have no > affect of review, what's more it will make reviewers more comfortable > with less and simple patches. > > Then we could have a clean patch set with almost 5 patches, not totally 28. > > librte_eal: add RTE_KDRV_NONE for vdevs > librte_ether: add fields from rte_pci_driver to rte_eth_dev_data > drivers: copy pci device info to eth_dev data > librte_ether: remove branches on pci_dev > drivers: remove pci device Yes I agree with Michael