From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A31FAA0471 for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 23:24:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E66C6231E; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 23:24:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BB661DBE for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 23:24:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0537142C; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 17:24:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 18 Jul 2019 17:24:19 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=1YjDINDFfoyEZHZla/ivitoEAfJIk2aEVJVNsz3+oEE=; b=cNWtTnsOv/DE zaW0MQpcoTxoNPHjDjRKSukLFydj3iQP7E07RrIghNBHuS3y3QkPg51jY0ZniQ/P hp/IfSuNWnJhEkXkBsQj89c83bKbq8bEVECq8Wz2ypsKza9QvaR5c0saqMnuGo/P OIxx4MLhY25DpZjGsylDUylrSXZDtY8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=1YjDINDFfoyEZHZla/ivitoEAfJIk2aEVJVNsz3+o EE=; b=p2JP5Vsk/wuMjBdI30EzDx6ueQKivZRf1FqYXSADYW5xk2hZRTHppnX4U REuRqrA1D8MozvpDPr81sUUqMC39fHFB+RKX6KsODOen7pjnhdL5ucZs9MqQRA6Y fAR0lRqlrxL1d8GjBBqCbxhFSSlSnj48vV3SxaiO0Xk46rTIhZ7vd3nBtr43NOeh e5q7m+5j+FcUH30Js5xiJj78zPSCSEPOoRXwF7QCh/ONZhYFwxc/YJipt5si0qX5 meVluFGBdzt7PS5R9J4ts9UXrJt7yJyUwE5mxrKZ1t7QUynsD14kN8CzBjvYCRkc J5n9sh0t5cTatYTqWOr03KmTimi/g== X-ME-Sender: <xms:geMwXYOZNuYPNYOP6EyUF-SupS83YTpTTiKvPJDr-rhD53punANElg> X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrieehgdduieegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecukf hppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhh ohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedu X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:guMwXfHu9p8_L-BSnDv0XtgotWm86aun-0eZ98NUekIVC2SDk8zL-A> <xmx:guMwXdGg0jUrWf2TQg1KF2LNhih4zUiKz0iAd54xaCSFWaSAOEVCHg> <xmx:guMwXU9-yznEEGekypqhOgPD-Za6Hvdjdx-HMMytFhfvmn2kw1ckgg> <xmx:guMwXUMyxUIFjZGg1ql5kGJfGOgGj9NBBenWZDHIhxa2AQLlv8jN-g> Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6247B380079; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 17:24:17 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>, Yangchao Zhou <zhouyates@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 23:24:16 +0200 Message-ID: <1846983.CBm7lp9OS6@xps> In-Reply-To: <20190711083335.55356aeb@hermes.lan> References: <20190711123508.45219-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> <20190711083335.55356aeb@hermes.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] kni: fix possible buffer overflow X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> 11/07/2019 17:33, Stephen Hemminger: > On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 13:35:07 +0100 > Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> wrote: > > > 'kni_net_rx_lo_fifo()' can get segmented buffers, using 'pkt_len' for > > that case will be wrong and some values can cause buffer overflow > > in destination mbuf data. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> > > Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> Applied, thanks