DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
	dev@dpdk.org, "Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	Ori Kam <orika@mellanox.com>,
	"Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>,
	"Zhang, Xiao" <xiao.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] ethdev: fix build warning on 64-bit value
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 11:27:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1847700.fxN4lLDhpz@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8wkVZ5TiYaXR5QPV89kZ6t4+xOcMLkDEkENgD3eSrCxWA@mail.gmail.com>

27/04/2020 16:00, David Marchand:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 3:47 PM Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> > From: dev <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of David Marchand
> > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 3:34 PM Bruce Richardson
> > > <bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 03:23:41PM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> > > > > Building OVS with dpdk, sparse complains about 64-bit constant being
> > > > > passed as a normal integer that can't fit it:
> > > > > error: constant 0xffffffffffffffff is so big it is unsigned long
> > > > >
> > > > > Fixes: ecbc8570131d ("ethdev: add PFCP header to flow API")
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > > > > +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > > > >  static const struct rte_flow_item_pfcp rte_flow_item_pfcp_mask = {
> > > > >       .s_field = 0x01,
> > > > > -     .seid = RTE_BE64(0xffffffffffffffff),
> > > > > +     .seid = RTE_BE64(UINT64_C(0xffffffffffffffff)),
> > > >
> > > > Rather than cast, why not put "ULL" at the end. If we are going to cast,
> > > > why not just put "-1" in to save some digits.
> > >
> > > I preferred this form in the hope future developers who want
> > > 0x0fffffffffffffff will copy/paste this.
> > >
> >
> > As I remember there should be UINT64_MAX in stdint.h.
> 
> Yes, we could go with:
> +     .seid = RTE_BE64(UINT64_MAX),
> 
> And then next time, for any value like 0x0fff ffff ffff ffff (had to
> group the digits of what I had written), pretty sure we will miss this
> and I will catch it only when building ovs.

I agree with David (in general and especially here).

RTE_BE64 is required for static analyzers and is an explicit info.

UINT64_C is better than ULL suffix because it
	- is generic
	- gives size explicitly

UINT64_C(0xffffffffffffffff) is better than UINT64_MAX because
	- rte_flow.h has a lot of bitmasks
	- it is copy/paste safe

Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>



  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-28  9:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-27 13:23 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] 20.05-rc1 fixes for OVS David Marchand
2020-04-27 13:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] ring: fix build with -Wswitch-enum David Marchand
2020-04-27 14:55   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-27 13:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] eal: fix typo in endian conversion macros David Marchand
2020-04-27 13:35   ` Bruce Richardson
2020-04-27 13:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] ethdev: fix build warning on 64-bit value David Marchand
2020-04-27 13:33   ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-04-27 13:34   ` Bruce Richardson
2020-04-27 13:36     ` David Marchand
2020-04-27 13:46       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-27 14:00         ` David Marchand
2020-04-27 14:07           ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-04-27 14:12             ` David Marchand
2020-04-27 14:14               ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-04-28  9:27           ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2020-05-06 14:37             ` Morten Brørup
2020-04-27 13:39     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-04-27 13:40       ` David Marchand
2020-04-27 13:43         ` Bruce Richardson
2020-04-28  9:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] 20.05-rc1 fixes for OVS David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1847700.fxN4lLDhpz@thomas \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=orika@mellanox.com \
    --cc=xiao.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).