DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, anatoly.burakov@intel.com, ranjit.menon@intel.com,
	mb@smartsharesystems.com, Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@microsoft.com>,
	stephen@networkplumber.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] eal: change rte_fls and rte_bsf to return uint32_t
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2022 11:02:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1849229.jbyF5MZJ3u@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1659993692-17479-3-git-send-email-roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>

08/08/2022 23:21, Tyler Retzlaff:
> From: Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@microsoft.com>
> 
> return fixed width uint32_t to be consistent with what appears to
> be the original authors intent. it doesn't make much sense to return
> signed integers for these functions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
> ---
>  lib/eal/include/rte_common.h | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/eal/include/rte_common.h b/lib/eal/include/rte_common.h
> index a96cc2a..bd4184d 100644
> --- a/lib/eal/include/rte_common.h
> +++ b/lib/eal/include/rte_common.h
> @@ -707,7 +707,7 @@ static void __attribute__((destructor(RTE_PRIO(prio)), used)) func(void)
>   * @return
>   *     The last (most-significant) bit set, or 0 if the input is 0.
>   */
> -static inline int
> +static inline uint32_t
>  rte_fls_u32(uint32_t x)
>  {
>  	return (x == 0) ? 0 : 32 - __builtin_clz(x);
> @@ -724,7 +724,7 @@ static void __attribute__((destructor(RTE_PRIO(prio)), used)) func(void)
>   * @return
>   *     least significant set bit in the input parameter.
>   */
> -static inline int
> +static inline uint32_t
>  rte_bsf64(uint64_t v)
>  {
>  	return (uint32_t)__builtin_ctzll(v);
> @@ -766,7 +766,7 @@ static void __attribute__((destructor(RTE_PRIO(prio)), used)) func(void)
>   * @return
>   *     The last (most-significant) bit set, or 0 if the input is 0.
>   */
> -static inline int
> +static inline uint32_t
>  rte_fls_u64(uint64_t x)
>  {
>  	return (x == 0) ? 0 : 64 - __builtin_clzll(x);
> 

You forgot the _safe versions:

--- a/lib/eal/include/rte_common.h
+++ b/lib/eal/include/rte_common.h
@@ -660,7 +660,7 @@ rte_bsf32(uint32_t v)
  * @return
  *     Returns 0 if ``v`` was 0, otherwise returns 1.
  */
-static inline int
+static inline uint32_t
 rte_bsf32_safe(uint32_t v, uint32_t *pos)
 {
        if (v == 0)
@@ -739,7 +739,7 @@ rte_bsf64(uint64_t v)
  * @return
  *     Returns 0 if ``v`` was 0, otherwise returns 1.
  */
-static inline int
+static inline uint32_t
 rte_bsf64_safe(uint64_t v, uint32_t *pos)
 {
        if (v == 0)






  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-05  9:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-10 23:24 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: propose correction rte_bsf64 return type declaration Tyler Retzlaff
2021-03-15 19:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: propose correction rte_{bsf, fls} inline functions type use Tyler Retzlaff
2021-10-25 19:14   ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-26  7:45     ` Morten Brørup
2021-11-11  4:15       ` Tyler Retzlaff
2021-11-11 11:54         ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-11-11 12:41           ` Morten Brørup
2022-07-11 14:07             ` Jerin Jacob
2022-07-13 10:13             ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-07-18 21:28               ` Tyler Retzlaff
2022-08-08 21:21 ` [PATCH 0/3] cleanup bsf and fls inline function return types Tyler Retzlaff
2022-08-08 21:21   ` [PATCH 1/3] doc: announce cleanup of rte_{bsf, fls} inline functions type use Tyler Retzlaff
2022-10-05  9:06     ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-08-08 21:21   ` [PATCH 2/3] eal: change rte_fls and rte_bsf to return uint32_t Tyler Retzlaff
2022-10-05  9:02     ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2022-10-05 15:15       ` Tyler Retzlaff
2022-10-05 15:23         ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-10-05 15:40           ` [PATCH] eal: fix return type of bsf safe functions Thomas Monjalon
2022-10-05 19:41             ` David Marchand
2022-10-05 22:20               ` Tyler Retzlaff
2022-10-06  0:27                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-10-06 18:20             ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-08-08 21:21   ` [PATCH 3/3] test: fix sign compare warning for rte_bsf64 return type change Tyler Retzlaff
2022-08-08 21:42   ` [PATCH 0/3] cleanup bsf and fls inline function return types Stephen Hemminger
2022-08-09  8:26   ` Morten Brørup
2022-10-05 10:11     ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1849229.jbyF5MZJ3u@thomas \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
    --cc=ranjit.menon@intel.com \
    --cc=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=roretzla@microsoft.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).