From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 269F6A0547; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 20:00:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC88141108; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 20:00:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from new2-smtp.messagingengine.com (new2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.224]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D747410D7 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 20:00:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92AE25808A5; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 14:00:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 18 Apr 2021 14:00:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= Ii3sXwbeHwtsTgjxIr7kgs8j9aHKYs4KCvjTX+UBDb0=; b=tPgZ684QD9Gm7f58 xSR+VjHRNVVsNndjPGmWB0vHJ3fHs0TaGUaTLvmvEWk/U62+tvj53aL7VWvz9pgj QpOqy5tP+wYYGhjqdcl7DwvXgEmd8OUImL1InhJFjucnvrHRcUjyXkzibrc/bhEU VMRE51DdusWvkLIXVCCQwH+bO1dm74sWp84ZFeUud6uwJ3DEUIc47rb5bqRdAoXz QdvcQryeMJpQgVXXqgVLVrcggNmbWivmrqMqY4IsZ2gsYSCIwf5F008mNt45iBk8 8dilaNOUuJ8imPmDFRhr1GOng5rRUnEPwmqKqbtXh1XNuSzG2/bYpu8WWie4/T24 goA+6w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=Ii3sXwbeHwtsTgjxIr7kgs8j9aHKYs4KCvjTX+UBD b0=; b=AXTTnXHpagCIBAJcM5spKKz0AHeZ14jd37111CPDIV+GYWcu83XIDLcIh 4+aKlC1ko04RpbVH/ASa/aatMRfAx90rp5YxlfbQJuHAmgkoufAYISQhKKYXcRtd NjLtd7hDZZvH2HrmWGtS0kByvXpRRbXPEUq4bMR7YABfXxA7N77QYBru4AF4qfhu xZlq2/gIipVhbhb5iD6oFpIhQ242UyRndrWy6/anuk1LdjOob+nWggJNEEWLXOIr xdKBHrfkksZpfnymEDSglDD60n0r0eXmmbfSdZ5TX5tQnPoZMw+mkwo1eB/3nL/w DxVvFXzEmEFO6chcEUsKU1AF2CMrg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvddtuddgvdekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghl ohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1B59E108006E; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 14:00:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Ori Kam , Gregory Etelson Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com" , "andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "ferruh.yigit@intel.com" , "jerinj@marvell.com" , "jerinjacobk@gmail.com" , "olivier.matz@6wind.com" , Slava Ovsiienko , Matan Azrad , Raslan Darawsheh Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2021 20:00:02 +0200 Message-ID: <1852738.iHGiNb0lnC@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] ethdev: add packet integrity checks X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 18/04/2021 10:15, Gregory Etelson: > > > > +__extension__ > > > > > > Why extension here? > > > If this is because of the anonymous union, it should be RTE_STD_C11 > > > before the union. > > > Same for the struct. > > > > > O.K > > The RTE_STD_C11 macro fails compilation on > RHEL-7.9 with gcc version 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44) This macro is used eveywhere in DPDK. What is failing exactly?