From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 141CB3B5 for ; Mon, 15 May 2017 14:35:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A812F20A02; Mon, 15 May 2017 08:35:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 15 May 2017 08:35:56 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=cHgzAF6ycY+bC+1AqhIwaydvuOG++J53KiMgOJ 7oj2U=; b=T7kuB/zuz3Og3LrpziKxdBMA73ZDr5F2jOi1OlBtoN5komsSXPbPTp yT56H8XDexI6o802t5LYsOTPbc697bTU92/FfYpYkW4lexugy4P7Ot/TEtoZDp4m V6KBv8qCis5DMk/bpfNkZuDLpaJeACPMJBHNdRlDFfqo8fSkcXlUw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=cHgzAF6ycY+bC+1Aqh IwaydvuOG++J53KiMgOJ7oj2U=; b=rSbAzInctB26gG2ld2czU5ErpDr5YSaRGj rXFRxO9aCWv0PAnkry20RcjGbgLgiue5RlDw4AYqcPXKDjBMmik12CQMPm1fpxec quIc3idPpwK/nvn00skTS3jqzletYgsTfkl67PMR3KmhSEdTexHrf6I/Z0TEY7j7 oQFqDClX5tsutEocDbjMVx0YDtgGtS2l7ln3wUtRpm15kp+IAM7+r1tCcbhYJrM/ Vj8u3KT7298X0Po8sAkQXm6rYpy9oRFjmL4MBUbFEDmnC/Lupo2ZSZriHvHgsa79 kDiskP4rukhN8pBtDqxjw90gfyYfMki+NGZlkeOPAEYKZ/dTYYBg== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: 9xzp+6bUbO6H2COCWnJ0cuBmg3Nk8tvVQJBdw2A4Ts+p 1494851756 Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 631637E9F4; Mon, 15 May 2017 08:35:56 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: ferruh.yigit@intel.com Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Yuanhan Liu , Maxime Coquelin , Jing Chen , Helin Zhang , Jingjing Wu , Wenzhuo Lu , Konstantin Ananyev , Bruce Richardson Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 14:35:55 +0200 Message-ID: <1857248.OtrprS2xZT@xps> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: [dpdk-dev] SIMD Rx/Tx paths X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 12:35:57 -0000 Hi, I would like to open a discussion about SIMD code in drivers. I think we should not have different behaviours or features capabilities, in the different code paths of a same driver. I suggest to consider such differences as exceptions. So we should merge features files (i.e. matrix columns), and remove these files: % ls doc/guides/nics/features/*_vec.ini doc/guides/nics/features/fm10k_vec.ini doc/guides/nics/features/fm10k_vf_vec.ini doc/guides/nics/features/i40e_vec.ini doc/guides/nics/features/i40e_vf_vec.ini doc/guides/nics/features/ixgbe_vec.ini doc/guides/nics/features/ixgbe_vf_vec.ini doc/guides/nics/features/virtio_vec.ini If a feature is not supported in all code paths of a driver, it must be marked as partially (P) supported. Then the mid-term goal will be to try removing these inconsistencies. Opinions/comments?