From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf0-f45.google.com (mail-lf0-f45.google.com [209.85.215.45]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24825BD2A for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 16:38:59 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-lf0-f45.google.com with SMTP id k86so40535554lfi.0 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 07:38:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LtptWTx1jwMFJcpn5AiXG8kVeOx8vXXCgg7CHHVPrsg=; b=lgdzXTkJ0n4v/66Cc8oDZKwzMPDhpCdT5JJMgIWcZddNtOZzBKg8xGoElBp5jJ9pnk LF+qWtULLq1gtpaRLFBYjTijphV4RxSetQJXT8uTYqJdCs0UVKscic9YLQIAdSJlvVBT vpokUhrZVBkbb+Vzydv2AkVCu5xpH8ucIla8Qc5Za01XufSzdYI5B2lmORHyDzADqHpn 9lreKSdJ2mDJHggB+SazqGzAQ1Jo88xMP7yBZSpGjI+TSfemOE5nfceo2g9THcZA0lYe 3Ad5vQAOjvfmQNfoCzxbU62o7on5kkZ8jotkVKPTuJPYeIy0mfVS7c85Eq2XmE3KSfZd yGPQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LtptWTx1jwMFJcpn5AiXG8kVeOx8vXXCgg7CHHVPrsg=; b=pC/Hvd74JqvlrBjQ9vA/0219O1x649c4gah6kmS955pra1Y8ziV/gVfyElHMTB0SYz A7mb/d0rSilTTJ1bReqfeyXLdEDXfXRtuofZcZCcp3VbWq4izeUSNTL/FCZ8jSTWJthF 31QwfCLr3xrN2k04SoqXIGjcSpEOvgFExftO6nZMrBeo836VmEskDnrBkuNnUXHmgcRC q30ypFC3UeAj5+mTsv7hUWEKULlDsJeSCQ/QwvjrgFNlw47JthER1ZndrB2BY/WJcHtj WH4AdbK0VzXrXP7lAYMsr1Oi2AnmBJkeXWS1RfO0MbtMbTFCc3v4vT4LlSolgQLA/KIc mnBw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKemGkatev99gdqdSptwjVoIOYD425OPMl0XQaa1cjkpBRJan17GPVi9lGkAKVifKvs X-Received: by 10.25.210.147 with SMTP id j141mr6619536lfg.78.1484321938662; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 07:38:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v26sm3976677ljd.9.2017.01.13.07.38.57 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 13 Jan 2017 07:38:57 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Ferruh Yigit Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 16:38:56 +0100 Message-ID: <1859631.d3X9H1Gb87@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <088c65d6-e709-23dd-3a86-e90e192fd30f@intel.com> References: <20170112191212.22710-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <088c65d6-e709-23dd-3a86-e90e192fd30f@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] make a couple eth_dev_ops const X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 15:38:59 -0000 2017-01-12 21:54, Ferruh Yigit: > On 1/12/2017 7:12 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > Really trivial patches. > > Patches are not in patchwork, and not in the mail list. > > > I also consider this a litmus test of how long it takes DPDK > > project to merge trivial maintaince patches. This is a nice example of why patches are not merged timely, sometimes they are not received at all :) In order to reduce the time needed to merge, could you please run devtools/check-git-log.sh ?