From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F35FA0096 for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 12:42:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74EA61BC18; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 12:42:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD13C1BBFF; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 12:42:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3669E21540; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 06:42:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 04 Jun 2019 06:42:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=jYDNS8eDAW7firB3TyQSj+o4I2Txnldr/xTKgII36nE=; b=b9qN/DDiMauC NhReGXEEC3QVrIpShk53QGb/jAn8HAulg/myB+mlQdcnEOGakq0Q4JxXWk692DIr kAxZogchIu76+f8Wgo5KWpy1iEuCSAf7TMHiuGok2EBSJKFtksSp93sO3KfIDbc7 YK+fF9PpfzW/NQeYO1O1xTpzCiNZqzo= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=jYDNS8eDAW7firB3TyQSj+o4I2Txnldr/xTKgII36 nE=; b=Ef2J+9r+dMdBKiNWrgvmGOQFbZwUiwA3VWhVhH575h+GOKKdmXMx9gWBo gnyTXI9rMZtKdS4n/DtP0vxcg7/uZ6N+6MwbLLh8YfK+3awaecHGsVqFU2nj/0zm Kr1SOfmZk82LE0qS663LAKlGTCRmZ9+BuMCZTjqCURhr63YLYzF/qeNzIAVOCYbw SiRfLM9LSYyXRFxetrAIdKs2kJWucyeJfPWmIENaphh28Rkc/rbMNTU1WShngk5+ EFr0uavamYW4T48FFN8Sd8Jm5ooO6l58BmkvDA/ZeCSK9Ix/tdyMSTSR9N5cSQqh yjtTU5W+ytXlIncy0CJsychY9PJsw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrudefledgfedvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecukf hppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhh ohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EC65F80061; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 06:42:51 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Ali Alnubani Cc: stable@dpdk.org, "konstantin.ananyev@intel.com" , "dev@dpdk.org" Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2019 12:42:49 +0200 Message-ID: <1862449.XiZpO5FNKu@xps> In-Reply-To: <20190506094857.14248-1-alialnu@mellanox.com> References: <20190506094857.14248-1-alialnu@mellanox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] examples/ip_fragmentation: fix Tx queues init X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 06/05/2019 11:49, Ali Alnubani: > The application tries to configure queue ids larger > than the maximum allowed by MAX_TX_QUEUE_PER_PORT. This > causes the startup error: > > " > ... > Initializing port 0 on lcore 0... Address:7C:FE:90:12:23:0D > txq=0,0 txq=1,1 txq=2,2 txq=3,3 txq=4,4 txq=5,5 txq=6,6 txq=7,7 txq=8,8 > txq=9,9 txq=10,10 txq=11,11 txq=12,12 txq=13,13 txq=14,14 txq=15,15 > txq=16,16 Invalid TX queue_id=16 > > EAL: Error - exiting with code: 1 > Cause: rte_eth_tx_queue_setup: err=-22, port=0 > " > > The error reproduces when lcores aren't set, and when the > machine has more than 16 cores. > > Fixes: af75078fece3 ("first public release") > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > Signed-off-by: Ali Alnubani Applied, thanks