From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com (mail-wm0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DE905A8B for ; Tue, 31 May 2016 08:34:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id z87so93532940wmh.0 for ; Mon, 30 May 2016 23:34:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=y0wQPB1Y6JsAiOkez2oBGSPyQ/Rosf/YcybGJFRMW/0=; b=LqgaZcE3qTP7jqZavcBlQ+Yjc6dxrLqR8OmVL+Y0FAPosDGoq+PWKgooe8ALiIgL/6 z0Rn3AezF5DgxT5qVggXnI2UvgWiuOayS+7GZBY6uFn5Gy5ywWEZlyKBcjvuD4lr/z6k bGs4fQj8+fxxvcvebtgonTpL8rXZ2kZ5ZJF6fIJ1GI8leFjTxdYTeXyNuVK8EolC13q7 fBSYvxz2XSKCArTYxus09wrRZsZzhuWpbKYQPyz4AxY+HOtPcLGkYk5DsCREK5BndjFo 0iZeskJdt87Qa2ufrvDfTnz/BU4IeKGyCdrkDbHATPECOik/rrTMDC0zva1q+JeNWrhK 5BKw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=y0wQPB1Y6JsAiOkez2oBGSPyQ/Rosf/YcybGJFRMW/0=; b=FhD9c7AWhAdO7IOman1hM/VXFpiXhX9J3a2/l+Et3NgtkYEmelnoH2yWeO7VUzXxeQ +zgrL5zPo1V+dcXPG8cxM6wEmKlM1aE1naAkmGwoYStE6iL1rhh/SWMOAh6JpELEefqB 9YrszbZX2hGGCqCeaVovoDubQdfYxBrphwUpJqO/g4tp+7fa+WiHXZPgn5IMt2BpHsGE EMDYGJqrh2YZhNlCozk9HesGgHH/Vobru8jtm917/v788l9tEhV5MT+WrR+nWWuAQM3B 9DBcGKoa9jd1tyGeo8j2RCPrgv+DDnQ0AheczvUNGjPyabCn5I+y19Zqi+Pe4ntAiFXz BEXQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tL1sO9752m09QyVDhfw26VHvI64w2T+B3FW+7vyWqM1uofsdTdy6ZE/CtTB8xlq+MoI X-Received: by 10.28.54.150 with SMTP id y22mr13614023wmh.70.1464676454374; Mon, 30 May 2016 23:34:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (111.204.154.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.154.204.111]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u4sm38123082wjz.4.2016.05.30.23.34.11 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 30 May 2016 23:34:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 23:34:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 08:34 +0200 From: Thomas Monjalon To: "xu,huilong" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Message-ID: <1870248.vegVUhPneT@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1464662412-2695-1-git-send-email-huilongx.xu@intel.com> References: <1464662412-2695-1-git-send-email-huilongx.xu@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] change log level for check when add port in blacklist X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 06:34:14 -0000 2016-05-31 10:40, xu, huilong: > maybe we should change log level, when add port in blacklist,for check it easy. > and it not influence performance and function Please, could you show an example of the device init logs at INFO level before and after this patch? Thanks