From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f48.google.com (mail-wm0-f48.google.com [74.125.82.48]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 529A056A9 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 16:13:06 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f48.google.com with SMTP id p63so33167981wmp.1 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 07:13:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=4bVvOQtTuctHyePmM5PbAbRIg2Xi1RCiR2g2IVDhp5g=; b=kWOPnZE6mJmRYpn5+Fnxh+GfK56jZ98aYGfsYsTHimCKLh2IBJjEMtza61gLbEtndH oYjjFRJUazFVTRywmxdfV4hjZEnUXzIIkQ9RtOdXwFtAXlzJZRwjVDgMt8AJl3dQoatd zXz8v/+GMhdmza9La0Z3gcVD0ALm+0TDRVJHPj3mx79TUD4AqE+OI0rYg5NyWHhG+5Zt csa4pQIdVigaZLSW9kcAxapssYbY33K3P/HjO2j2r1t9Vu+LwUr3LINhGWXHp9FNYyPj WVBI/PmLudMJ3QLO2ycnqxGRI3R5Qp7Axr1eDXld0sybrzBPUZtKsXkaB5iHG7QmtJ5S UQjQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=4bVvOQtTuctHyePmM5PbAbRIg2Xi1RCiR2g2IVDhp5g=; b=WiRcAc8vaBHaATOhM2REIIikQZjftA9jxzLfesefciKnGMweBIjKVnp2F9ZQjUnJFH H7KmaS+B3XiiULeOowfKKmNiSFVQhb5waNLtmRY4if+Wt92KeMwoiarQIK0WiOs3xosF ndGoDUGYUejsx+pE2cT3lE0zTxclCeFLTct/JBLANbei0GLgTEuV1XxsEcjZEwqXhHSR V5N3ZxtrLLt7L9q/G22i6isRwN3EK6Na0LJOnvF4fJEOMuy4ooBjd94z7Qh8yEPxYKNP PN3/F6HcCelpZ4iZ5aSEmDac6WnMcA7LCP7bD2ukkAhxKQl/iEn4hG9ak3taug4Yw1iN jLnw== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORMyuggMjvUXSNKuwJBwQOL0LwRK4eVzK9mU4Bo/Ie59QSdgKmryzGV3xgjunk/XFKm X-Received: by 10.194.84.34 with SMTP id v2mr36138959wjy.175.1455117186083; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 07:13:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b1sm3419347wjy.0.2016.02.10.07.13.05 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 10 Feb 2016 07:13:05 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: John McNamara Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 16:11:40 +0100 Message-ID: <1877379.9acYIlBRDX@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1455114792-1603-1-git-send-email-john.mcnamara@intel.com> References: <1450704384-9986-2-git-send-email-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <1455114792-1603-1-git-send-email-john.mcnamara@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] version: switch to year/month version numbers X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 15:13:06 -0000 2016-02-10 14:33, John McNamara: > /** > * Major version number i.e. the x in x.y.z > */ > -#define RTE_VER_MAJOR 2 > +#define RTE_VER_MAJOR 16 > > /** > * Minor version number i.e. the y in x.y.z > */ > -#define RTE_VER_MINOR 3 > +#define RTE_VER_MINOR 4 > I liked the idea of Bruce of renaming these constants to *_YEAR and *_MONTH. I also think RTE_VER_PATCH_LEVEL should be RTE_VER_MINOR. And maybe that RTE_VER_PATCH_RELEASE should be RTE_VER_RELEASE. It shouldn't hurt applications as they must use RTE_VERSION and rte_version(). Opinions?