From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: "Juraj Linkeš" <juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech>,
"David Marchand" <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "mdr@ashroe.eu" <mdr@ashroe.eu>,
Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>,
Michael Santana <maicolgabriel@hotmail.com>,
Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>,
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] ci: fix ABI reference generation
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:20:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1882583.4QfryVaJDx@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8zXKfibDTbOUvrEjTDwQ6u+wSxK52oHMRrc+wWxbzcf8A@mail.gmail.com>
16/04/2021 11:17, David Marchand:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 8:39 AM Juraj Linkeš <juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech> wrote:
> > >
> > > Stick to a compatible configuration passing -Dmachine=default.
> > >
> > > Note: the breakage was not seen earlier this week as I guess the CI workers are
> > > using a cached ABI reference for v20.11.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 5b3a6ca6fd28 ("build: alias default build as generic")
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Juraj Linkeš <juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech>
> >
> > Do we want to change this back to -Dmachine=generic after next release?
>
> This seems fine to me.
If we change back in 21.08, we won't be able to test 21.08
against 20.11 or 21.02, right?
Wouldn't be better to wait 21.11?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-16 9:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-15 16:32 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ci: bump ABI reference version David Marchand
2021-04-15 16:57 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-15 19:28 ` David Marchand
2021-04-15 19:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] ci: fix ABI reference generation David Marchand
2021-04-15 19:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] ci: bump ABI reference version David Marchand
2021-04-15 19:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] ci: fix ABI reference generation David Marchand
2021-04-15 19:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] ci: bump ABI reference version David Marchand
2021-04-16 12:11 ` David Marchand
2021-04-16 6:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] ci: fix ABI reference generation Juraj Linkeš
2021-04-16 9:17 ` David Marchand
2021-04-16 9:20 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2021-04-16 9:49 ` David Marchand
2021-04-16 9:55 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1882583.4QfryVaJDx@thomas \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech \
--cc=maicolgabriel@hotmail.com \
--cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).