From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E102FA0A0C; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 14:45:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72F8A411A7; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 14:45:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0CCB40E3C; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 14:45:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FA0A5C0132; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 08:45:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 03 Aug 2021 08:45:04 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= woDEw3bLuSYoVNyXXCvbTL4CJCRk4bByKmscZAfSRd0=; b=Cp+a9OdofoL/PGWE 0cECOPZDz5WcnEz9SQcZ3RFBmcH5bSn/flp4blTewjhyf2U8BS4iE1yaiiAO2Vtr BXTyv56pQSLmRwNsY7fTDc3g+xHIhxx5xyMhhOYH2M6WMYBJPujkxXHEb+u94t7k nwxUkQ08j7PRVB0Z0vhNnBhZW1IL+YYUDArTEz5i8hxwBrLK8hxGYz086jbhif5v 5d/HjT5r/AAYaUO3+QVaEhR38P6LjUwTYuZ2Eu3PKEdl84jN54zhltBod47/RsuC Z+gYJNZWJt7ouIoMDRTKLoqbHLF6Wb3KSjLcw7HW7WNDa6Vy4hJ50NvnevugAcC6 2i91EA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=woDEw3bLuSYoVNyXXCvbTL4CJCRk4bByKmscZAfSR d0=; b=F4kW2m2V4pGF9eUClhKV9PSGn9HbmA164+K2lJ5+aIzOgjjmrmncCCUE0 ZatqRDMr83hgPgcmWHvcCdOmtTye1yo41eSSXFGe+19sEG9mX9ZTkGkEBHBzKO6+ Lj4T7NZxIXP0+5MNuoz2JoHTdNz24yq58SkyJTjOlgZhg9p6E7jqtiX3rRGmDrst o+0LGZbxNLc21HpY3XgAFvtXaj3USbdE1Rg+1T70p6J7nRUSYIHP7iv+E5WMBRbA 2p6kKuZ31NVe5zvj2bKMECKjy5ug+5MU0Mx8tN+rkqTOd86fCmMS2zAwgwZm1r00 uvoYtAUD1pawyMu0WRLtrCtf6lTmQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrieeggdehfecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefgeelgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdejueei iedvffegheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhroh hmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 08:45:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Rongwei Liu Cc: Matan Azrad , Ori Kam , Raslan Darawsheh , dev@dpdk.org, "stable@dpdk.org" , Slava Ovsiienko Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2021 14:45:01 +0200 Message-ID: <1895293.RnesTUdgTu@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <2220126.5qsbnr2OsU@thomas> <20210802122048.555306-1-rongweil@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/mlx5: fix vni matching with non-std port at ConnectX-5 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > > In the recent update, the misc5 matcher was introduced to match VxLAN > > header extra fields. However, ConnectX-5 doesn't support misc5 for the UDP > > ports different from VXLAN's standard one (4789). > > > > Need to fall back to the previous approach and use legacy misc matcher if > > non-standard UDP port is recognized in VxLAN flow. > > > > Fixes: 630a587bfb37 ("net/mlx5: support matching on VXLAN reserved field") > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > > > Signed-off-by: Rongwei Liu > Acked-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko new title: net/mlx5: fix VXLAN VNI matching on ConnectX-5 Applied, thanks.