DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
To: Somnath Kotur <somnath.kotur@broadcom.com>,
	JP Lee <jongpil.lee@broadcom.com>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>, Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
	Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
	"Sachin Saxena" <sachin.saxena@nxp.com>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"David Marchand" <david.marchand@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] mbuf: fix to update documentation of PKT_RX_QINQ_STRIPPED
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 16:04:49 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <18e23d24-58b3-383b-3891-964a6d18a602@solarflare.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOBf=ms5gDqBpUn3-Rb0GJB2ZcWLmByhnwe2tjmT6P=poLTqwA@mail.gmail.com>

Somnath,

On 12/31/19 5:15 AM, Somnath Kotur wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 3:23 PM Andrew Rybchenko
> <arybchenko@solarflare.com> wrote:
>> On 12/24/19 6:16 AM, Somnath Kotur wrote:
>>> Given that we haven't heard any objection from anyone in a while on
>>> this ...can we get this in please?
>> I'm sorry, but have you seen below?
>> It means that PKT_RX_QINQ_STRIPPED, PKT_RX_QINQ, PKT_RX_VLAN
>> and PKT_RX_VLAN_STRIPPED must be clarified.
>>
> OK, not sure I understood what is the next action here? Will you or someone
> from the main tree maintainers be sending out a patch with this clarification?

Please, send non-RCF version of the patch which fixes
PKT_RX_QINQ_STRIPPED and PKT_RX_QINQ description.
PKT_RX_QINQ must not claim that both VLAN headers
have been stripped in the case of PKT_RX_QINQ_STRIPPED.

I think that VLAN should be used instead of "vlan" in description
as well as TCI instead of "tci". Also vlans -> VLANs.

>> It sounds like change of semantics in order to resolve the
>> problem, but anyway it is still a small change of semantics.

May be dropped.

>> BTW, it is better to make summary human readable and avoid
>> PKT_RX_QINQ_STRIPPED (I guess check-git-log.sh yells on it).

Please, don't forget about it as well.

>> Also RFC patch cannot be applied, non-RFC version is required.
>>
>> CC main tree maintainers.
>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 2:43 PM Andrew Rybchenko
>>> <arybchenko@solarflare.com> wrote:
>>>> On 12/16/19 11:47 AM, Somnath Kotur wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 12:01 PM Andrew Rybchenko
>>>>> <arybchenko@solarflare.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 12/16/19 6:16 AM, Somnath Kotur wrote:
>>>>>>> Certain hardware may be able to strip and/or save only the outermost
>>>>>>> VLAN instead of both the VLANs in the mbuf in a QinQ scenario.
>>>>>>> To handle such cases, we could re-interpret setting of just PKT_RX_QINQ_STRIPPED
>>>>>>> to indicate that only the outermost VLAN has been stripped by the hardware and
>>>>>>> saved in mbuf->vlan_tci_outer.
>>>>>>> Only When both PKT_RX_QINQ_STRIPPED and PKT_RX_VLAN_STRIPPED are set, the 2 vlans
>>>>>>> have been stripped by the hardware and their tci are saved in mbuf->vlan_tci (inner)
>>>>>>> and mbuf->vlan_tci_outer (outer).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Somnath Kotur <somnath.kotur@broadcom.com>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: JP Lee <jongpil.lee@broadcom.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>  lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_core.h | 15 +++++++++++----
>>>>>>>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_core.h b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_core.h
>>>>>>> index 9a8557d..db1070b 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_core.h
>>>>>>> +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_core.h
>>>>>>> @@ -124,12 +124,19 @@
>>>>>>>  #define PKT_RX_FDIR_FLX      (1ULL << 14)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  /**
>>>>>>> - * The 2 vlans have been stripped by the hardware and their tci are
>>>>>>> - * saved in mbuf->vlan_tci (inner) and mbuf->vlan_tci_outer (outer).
>>>>>>> + * The outer vlan has been stripped by the hardware and their tci are
>>>>>>> + * saved in mbuf->vlan_tci_outer (outer).
>>>>>>>   * This can only happen if vlan stripping is enabled in the RX
>>>>>>>   * configuration of the PMD.
>>>>>>> - * When PKT_RX_QINQ_STRIPPED is set, the flags (PKT_RX_VLAN |
>>>>>>> - * PKT_RX_VLAN_STRIPPED | PKT_RX_QINQ) must also be set.
>>>>>>> + * When PKT_RX_QINQ_STRIPPED is set, the flags (PKT_RX_VLAN |  PKT_RX_QINQ)
>>>>>>> + * must also be set.
>>>>>>> + * When both PKT_RX_QINQ_STRIPPED and PKT_RX_VLAN_STRIPPED are set, the 2 vlans
>>>>>>> + * have been stripped by the hardware and their tci are saved in
>>>>>>> + * mbuf->vlan_tci (inner) and mbuf->vlan_tci_outer (outer).
>>>>>>> + * This can only happen if vlan stripping is enabled in the RX configuration
>>>>>>> + * of the PMD.
>>>>>>> + * When PKT_RX_QINQ_STRIPPED and PKT_RX_VLAN_STRIPPED are set,
>>>>>>> + * (PKT_RX_VLAN | PKT_RX_QINQ) must also be set.
>>>>>>>   */
>>>>>>>  #define PKT_RX_QINQ_STRIPPED (1ULL << 15)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I always thought that PKT_RX_VLAN_STRIPPED means *one* VLAN
>>>>>> stripped regardless if it is outer (if the packet is double
>>>>>> tagged) or inner (if only one VLAN tag was present).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's why PKT_RX_QINQ_STRIPPED description says that *two*
>>>>>> VLANs have been stripped.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What is the problem with such approach?
>>>>> The problem is that RX_VLAN_STRIPPED implies that the stripped VLAN
>>>>> (outer or inner) is saved in mbuf->vlan_tci, correct?
>>>> Yes.
>>>>
>>>>> There is no way to convey that it is in QinQ mode and yet only outer
>>>>> VLAN has been stripped and saved in mbuf->vlan_tci_outer ?
>>>> Ah, it looks like I understand now that the problem is in
>>>> PKT_RX_QINQ description which claims that TCI is saved in
>>>> mbuf->vlan_tci_outer and PKT_RX_QINQ_STRIPPED means that
>>>> both VLAN tags are stripped regardless (PKT_RX_VLAN_STRIPPED).
>>>> Moreover PKT_RX_QINQ_STRIPPED requires PKT_RX_VLAN_STRIPPED.
>>>>
>>>> It means that PKT_RX_QINQ_STRIPPED, PKT_RX_QINQ, PKT_RX_VLAN
>>>> and PKT_RX_VLAN_STRIPPED must be clarified.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure, but it looks like it could affect net/dpaa2,
>>>> so I'm including driver maintainers in CC.


  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-02 13:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-16  3:16 Somnath Kotur
2019-12-16  6:31 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-12-16  8:47   ` Somnath Kotur
2019-12-16  9:13     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-12-24  3:16       ` Somnath Kotur
2019-12-24  9:53         ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-12-27 14:50           ` Olivier Matz
2019-12-31  2:13             ` Somnath Kotur
2020-01-02 12:57             ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-12-31  2:15           ` Somnath Kotur
2020-01-02 13:04             ` Andrew Rybchenko [this message]
2020-01-06  8:36               ` Somnath Kotur

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=18e23d24-58b3-383b-3891-964a6d18a602@solarflare.com \
    --to=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=jongpil.lee@broadcom.com \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=sachin.saxena@nxp.com \
    --cc=somnath.kotur@broadcom.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).