From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com (mail-wm0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E506558A for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:06:21 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f53.google.com with SMTP id l124so24570722wmf.1 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 03:06:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cyaWFYJZuUqAzGG6s7djhlIX4gEc07PHLkaExsj1SWE=; b=k14LSQldCrSI13jNP7ZgyYdSOoWo8lfJycN62flM9jEyPfI00fqeAbDhQ1KsfW4IJY 3fj0A5HVK8n3VLbSsw71vOpmIaIcGjJzSHYShVR5z2Aklw+GZuc6FbkebL/ksMpYV0Oa 1lRPCiEIbIweZM7w30yvyNReMdwJEg+hnhpGLZO+T9TUHRC4dxCiyn/LIC2kgUw066xC iyvRHsR22SicyI8Kwj1iauupX2ErhJkPYZTp2cuqMirG7YiyURaIC0jQ9HIMSR1ThdI+ HxIGL+xojreNq9pIcyo4DQNz5yo852ktuODsgwak1QO7oxMf/UfaVbCbS7bmTcQkdCAO +bdg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=cyaWFYJZuUqAzGG6s7djhlIX4gEc07PHLkaExsj1SWE=; b=kfNQqQInn7ETYdtA0cwJ7Jx0odxHawyP3xHtJyOKDGIyMIdM3LgKLedvw/h/cKEzVi ESjdsQvTnweo5rTgwo0/TEnr0UQQthH00xYw1C0BG+loIXhXfh88yo2OjDlqnzYqDWjj B/QkiW1hmz86gHTqWyIlYtiuN+ghzRrDd7It13PWEPFABSNEQy+7TEqwy5bA2wxtri/j 34JHJ3U19YfxppVSAJtdUcaVBnnZMDp7ty4XrIcOgcf7+zo0dXAfAJENYZ7+yP8OmJiR Rt9/Kna4TTf7mUvRf1RHinqwPh9u9KGYWXy+2vED7dc+0ix2tKvdqWu+wsJEgvfaIt61 uT2g== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKXvKPqEFCaAPjvWYaZG2GoBtEZNZWSW1AAkaepbzgk4NVhSIF2OzuzSS+SnjLDhQFr X-Received: by 10.28.46.132 with SMTP id u126mr14796613wmu.67.1458295581070; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 03:06:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (91.111.75.86.rev.sfr.net. [86.75.111.91]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id jv7sm11563238wjb.36.2016.03.18.03.06.20 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 18 Mar 2016 03:06:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Tomasz Kulasek Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Jan Viktorin , jianbo.liu@linaro.org, jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:04:49 +0100 Message-ID: <1902439.xcempkFplY@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1458294767-5996-1-git-send-email-tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com> References: <1458293807-2604-1-git-send-email-tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com> <1458294767-5996-1-git-send-email-tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] examples/l3fwd: em path performance fix X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:06:21 -0000 2016-03-18 10:52, Tomasz Kulasek: > +#if !defined(NO_HASH_MULTI_LOOKUP) && defined(__ARM_NEON) I think we should use CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_ARM_NEON here. Any ARM maintainer to confirm? Note that there is already another occurence of this compiler flag: examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c:#elif defined(__ARM_NEON)