From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f52.google.com (mail-wm0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 101FE6CB5 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 12:06:21 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f52.google.com with SMTP id r141so12275654wmg.1 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 03:06:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rxit+aBCnGXPJmDfgkSz1MtPvV8twbA4byKpl/WKwhg=; b=T7FIRv5jDk59RvNkwqMjk3ETootBoItR7y0f8YlH4yLBkF3VgHXV5vb+RDOk0Fm2g0 vKK8uPokKpRmd+hdv29v2SeI2P2pTZHQ8JbjOGY+b4hOZ+WUyYz+usxNm8Tjjxr+BR09 hF2xRSbokFXEm7hhBG9ROaoc73aXa3nXG4rXVps9QydljrXC0id7Ijs1m61pOjEXiPFm hMSFYP7a8929BdEGLsORiO0kmvu3YBwBE3FbM79HWOH8bb9Q//qCkg3hN5EsO/QDoEJ8 /xAAEvMTKQnEuwSaWEJdd52GyNjG/ZVcMgxn1mk2OsVr5OphU+ki/4cRy4629nmunSuM 1S1g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rxit+aBCnGXPJmDfgkSz1MtPvV8twbA4byKpl/WKwhg=; b=R1PaiTPP90gotYWMFLdXYx+Hc+JA8CxzgjtAsToa9D4q/cXyJ/sfdO4XNfm2mCyPcI HxFzoQW57ND93v9ZdJH/joNWuukOsplzykrHQcT14LEE5SlAvBmKqbJv/DK8T53qSZ07 YYL+1Sw2/AHYcbFu/VOWuavVzSe0xF7NI+qzVh3JZwWf0ZZP8fPXQnBzMjEJxi/117k4 R43QfUJKfFbEdqTQODPnzRHWp66wSovK2MvLXyyB8pnxUVR1daKEdWRhzExVBC0ImfbS 2/UgktY4gKnD09TRG5qGLAnjl40ZpKYqdVE922RR6hL2sZJD+kNc4743NcZpPF3taAST upmg== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39kQJv3kovVMbT2mt/Qwq9lfItkTSCeTqzagjE8mIl3rOJun5C37f7KPnq5XUjQloZC1 X-Received: by 10.28.236.93 with SMTP id k90mr1799263wmh.40.1487243180832; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 03:06:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q1sm3006784wmd.6.2017.02.16.03.06.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 16 Feb 2017 03:06:20 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Tan, Jianfeng" Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , dev@dpdk.org, bruce.richardson@intel.com, yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Xen-devel Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 12:06:18 +0100 Message-ID: <1915354.hxpEe7tUeI@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <83319780-26e9-afb6-74cd-20c07dad04a7@intel.com> References: <1478504326-68105-1-git-send-email-jianfeng.tan@intel.com> <83319780-26e9-afb6-74cd-20c07dad04a7@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: claim responsability for xen X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 11:06:21 -0000 2016-11-11 04:49, Tan, Jianfeng: > Hi Thomas and Konrad, > > On 11/11/2016 2:59 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > >> 2016-11-07 07:38, Jianfeng Tan: > >>> As some users are still using xen as the hypervisor, I suggest to > >>> continue support for xen in DPDK. And from 16.11, I will be the > >>> maintainer of all xen-related files. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Jianfeng Tan > >> Applied > >> > >> Please Jianfeng, could you start your new role by sending a status > >> of Xen dom0 support in DPDK? I think there are some issues in latest releases. > > Yes, I'm on this. And hope to send out update in the next week. > > > Pls also CC me and xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org if possible. > > Glad to do that. > > Thanks, > Jianfeng Any news about Xen dom0 status in DPDK? I think there is not enough interest for Xen dom0 in the DPDK community. Last time we talked about, it was because of a severe bug which is not fixed yet: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-July/044207.html http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-July/044376.html The request (6 month ago) was to give more time for feedbacks: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-July/044847.html Is it time now to officially remove Dom0 support?