DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Ray Kinsella <mdr@ashroe.eu>, Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>,
	Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>,
	Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
	David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ethdev: deprecate header fields and metadata flow actions
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 13:50:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1919853.K5XBjjXOGd@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2ad462dd-11d0-33f0-778e-bd3f00e5e668@intel.com>

25/11/2021 13:31, Ferruh Yigit:
> On 11/24/2021 3:37 PM, Viacheslav Ovsiienko wrote:
> > diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> > index 6d087c64ef..d04a606b7d 100644
> > --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> > +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> > @@ -101,6 +101,20 @@ Deprecation Notices
> >     is deprecated as ambiguous with respect to the embedded switch. The use of
> >     these attributes will become invalid starting from DPDK 22.11.
> >   
> > +* ethdev: Actions ``OF_SET_MPLS_TTL``, ``OF_DEC_MPLS_TTL``, ``OF_SET_NW_TTL``,
> > +  ``OF_COPY_TTL_OUT``, ``OF_COPY_TTL_IN`` are deprecated as not supported by
> > +  PMDs, will be removed in DPDK 22.11.
> > +
> > +* ethdev: Actions ``OF_DEC_NW_TTL``, ``SET_IPV4_SRC``, ``SET_IPV4_DST``,
> > +  ``SET_IPV6_SRC``, ``SET_IPV6_DST``, ``SET_TP_SRC``, ``SET_TP_DST``,
> > +  ``DEC_TTL``, ``SET_TTL``, ``SET_MAC_SRC``, ``SET_MAC_DST``, ``INC_TCP_SEQ``,
> > +  ``DEC_TCP_SEQ``, ``INC_TCP_ACK``, ``DEC_TCP_ACK``, ``SET_IPV4_DSCP``,
> > +  ``SET_IPV6_DSCP``, ``SET_TAG``, ``SET_META`` are deprecated as superseded
> > +  by generic MODIFY_FIELD action, will be removed in DPDK 22.11.
> > +
> > +* ethdev: Actions ``OF_SET_VLAN_VID``, ``OF_SET_VLAN_PCP`` are deprecated
> > +  as superseded by generic MODIFY_FIELD action.
> > +
> 
> 
> I have a question about ABI/API related issue for rte_flow support,
> 
> If a driver removes an flow API item/action support, it directly impacts
> the user application. The application previously working may stop working
> and require code update, this is something we want to prevent with
> ABI policy. And this kind of changes are not caught by our tools.
> 
> Do we have a process to deprecate/remove a flow API item/action support?
> Like they can be only removed on ABI break release...

If possible, we should avoid removing them, or dropping support in a driver.
I think removing a feature could be considered only if not too many drivers
use it, or if it becomes a real burden to maintain.



  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-25 12:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-23  7:59 [PATCH] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2021-11-24  8:06 ` [PATCH v2] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2021-11-24 14:56   ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-11-24 15:37 ` [PATCH v3] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2021-11-24 15:59   ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-11-24 16:21   ` Ori Kam
2021-11-24 16:37     ` Slava Ovsiienko
2021-11-24 17:32       ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-11-24 18:09         ` Ori Kam
2021-11-25 11:53   ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-11-25 12:03     ` Somnath Kotur
2021-11-25 13:06     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-11-25 14:13       ` Slava Ovsiienko
2021-11-25 14:40         ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-11-25 14:52           ` Slava Ovsiienko
2021-11-25 14:15       ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-11-25 13:56     ` Slava Ovsiienko
2021-11-25 15:14       ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-11-25 15:53         ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-11-25 12:18   ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-11-25 12:29     ` Ori Kam
2021-11-25 12:46       ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-11-25 13:56         ` Ori Kam
2021-11-25 14:28           ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-11-25 12:31   ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-11-25 12:50     ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2021-11-26  9:51 ` [PATCH v4] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2021-11-26 12:53   ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-11-26 13:06     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-11-26 14:52       ` Olivier Matz
2021-11-26 17:07         ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1919853.K5XBjjXOGd@thomas \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
    --cc=orika@nvidia.com \
    --cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).