From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] test/test: introduce new test-case for rte_smp_mb()
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 01:16:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1920273.q5HlxWAJJN@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1516028680-2342-2-git-send-email-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
15/01/2018 16:04, Konstantin Ananyev:
> Simple functional test for rte_smp_mb() implementations.
> Also when executed on a single lcore could be used as rough
> estimation how many cycles particular implementation of rte_smp_mb()
> might take.
>
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> ---
> test/test/Makefile | 1 +
> test/test/test_barrier.c | 286 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I will add
F: test/test/test_barrier.c
in MAINTAINERS, when applying.
> +static inline void
> +store_load_barrier(uint32_t utype)
> +{
> + if (utype == USE_MB)
> + rte_mb();
> + else if (utype == USE_SMP_MB)
> + rte_smp_mb();
> + else
> + RTE_VERIFY(0);
> +}
It does not compile on ARM64.
I have sent a fix for ARM64 barrier macros:
https://dpdk.org/patch/33762
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-16 0:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-01 11:12 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH " Konstantin Ananyev
2017-12-01 11:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] eal/x86: Use lock-prefixed instructions to reduce cost of rte_smp_mb() Konstantin Ananyev
2017-12-01 18:04 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-12-01 23:08 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-03-08 21:15 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-12-11 17:11 ` Bruce Richardson
2017-12-11 17:30 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-12-18 15:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] eal/x86: Optimize rte_smp_mb() and create a new test case for it Konstantin Ananyev
2017-12-18 15:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] test/test: introduce new test-case for rte_smp_mb() Konstantin Ananyev
2018-01-12 17:23 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-12 17:58 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-01-13 13:54 ` Wiles, Keith
2018-01-13 13:54 ` Wiles, Keith
2018-01-15 15:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] eal/x86: Optimize rte_smp_mb() and create a new test case for it Konstantin Ananyev
2018-01-15 15:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] test/test: introduce new test-case for rte_smp_mb() Konstantin Ananyev
2018-01-16 0:16 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2018-01-15 15:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] eal/x86: Use lock-prefixed instructions to reduce cost of rte_smp_mb() Konstantin Ananyev
2018-01-15 15:09 ` Konstantin Ananyev
[not found] ` <8b05f533-d146-7f97-48f4-82ddcfc3613b@redhat.com>
2018-01-16 1:54 ` [dpdk-dev] Fwd: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-01-29 9:29 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-01-29 17:29 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-01-29 15:47 ` [dpdk-dev] " Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-30 19:33 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-12-18 15:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Konstantin Ananyev
2017-12-18 15:46 ` Bruce Richardson
2017-12-11 17:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] test/test: introduce new test-case for rte_smp_mb() Bruce Richardson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1920273.q5HlxWAJJN@xps \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).