From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A51BCA0C50;
	Sat, 24 Jul 2021 13:36:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20CC940DDA;
	Sat, 24 Jul 2021 13:36:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from new1-smtp.messagingengine.com (new1-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.221]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 004D24067A;
 Sat, 24 Jul 2021 13:36:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44])
 by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54E28581695;
 Sat, 24 Jul 2021 07:36:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162])
 by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 24 Jul 2021 07:36:50 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h=
 from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references
 :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh=
 FFvvJF7tAuzdXEf8C1rCyKiWwBXORlLWjqXK/CftQOg=; b=3QLphMyBSxapsjUe
 v46biVYQDWjKDXF4kdg1rwaekaMzqU3/z4XJGzXKc4unx+wSm+qwcPebP7yz25tP
 JTHaMDVpau72hPrn5iYe5Ot5coi/q4JxSmB7FaiAjtKTaMP9H56q+iVnHOCH4Yxc
 emhgPCQnm/74lyYcazDfxg6ToOyrqqC//+GHZpGN98CJjzmKfNbxhMlWHtNhkATA
 Gb9vkAyYUn1fHjF8sKTy21QKEKIdZqlySw/WOAWNC76HTRtpi/WZXoEgksXd98VG
 q5Os77OGYEpBwMC5KCuuJBGMWuCD8ipOdkiDm0XvYiD1f97fYb69fCCObjjDXXYL
 z+NWnw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type
 :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
 :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender
 :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=FFvvJF7tAuzdXEf8C1rCyKiWwBXORlLWjqXK/CftQ
 Og=; b=gpmXPBIRdG9ucX2t3p81nrNXYt3DKy+7ryYXP2KcjOEVyb5FNuhAdAPLr
 +r+plyTBdIAVgmwKzXXC4dczGSGmnIHDADz8EUYeKBNDpn508NTKEg7uVNSOVflE
 SdQCHEpUEHWcFPKTp33QREkJbCP4e+MMb/1TJo07MsEdLrnzn7VhVn668wmoEkk3
 FXtzLqR9BsCfH9orhkojealWWcjrdxaKmWIGQKIVcRC+vLb38bKEGtQI359v2O7j
 56hm3tEbWyVycal32vLvb2+KSYWMDYhnbvU/rmoDxziuNPX0w3p7If6LD/5Bz0In
 wvzSsG51EpjKfUXZxW6Iy7H+cp9NA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:Ufv7YJ_0Hs5c8MyTy_TiOE2mESZQS8YqFugKTH6CrzuqOk9T9mvfyw>
 <xme:Ufv7YNsdfz9l5x47wjIJ7m1H4gO6gqOrwT5Y_Jh3UPhhtBL92uXiuE8opYz8Tv7Qh
 k8Idv5xcbtS61aXqg>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:Ufv7YHDQNqXrIarGO9VIPYB5ZtjiKkmZ1DgI5igzbikjvxZR8d8nb27w9kV9i0MxkYXgluTFioDh8kJb3UR4z9nBXA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrgedtgdegtdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf
 curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu
 uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc
 fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs
 ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf
 frrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefgeelgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdejueei
 iedvffegheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhroh
 hmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:Ufv7YNfLviPufPjV2N1dqT9rPDCCu5rrHcKaC-MRejRHHbFpt8P_EA>
 <xmx:Ufv7YOO41ztbxYBl65kA27JXKoaEVZD-reRjvp1Tt6KK8fN0X8cxgA>
 <xmx:Ufv7YPlGIBc8z6yNppJ-OdTkoy_SiBI8WGqbAQkAizFZNlv-h-Fy_w>
 <xmx:Uvv7YPFJeljfykuyC1TlVqD7acqNk7b8-kxuf_ZfdeaA-rL6HxcZAQ>
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sat,
 24 Jul 2021 07:36:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: dev@dpdk.org, Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com>
Cc: stable@dpdk.org, Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>,
 Xiaoyun Li <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>, Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
 andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru, ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com, jerinj@marvell.com,
 ferruh.yigit@intel.com, david.marchand@redhat.com,
 konstantin.ananyev@intel.com
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2021 13:37:13 +0200
Message-ID: <1920776.gAbG8fQetS@thomas>
In-Reply-To: <20210719083309.15428-1-getelson@nvidia.com>
References: <20210719083309.15428-1-getelson@nvidia.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix TX checksum calculation for
 tunnel
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Please we need more reviews for this patch.

19/07/2021 10:33, Gregory Etelson:
> TX checksum of a tunnelled packet can be calculated for outer headers
> only or for both outer and inner parts. The calculation method is
> determined by application.
> If TX checksum calculation can be offloaded, hardware ignores
> existing checksum value and replaces it with an updated result.
> If TX checksum is calculated by a software, existing value must be
> zeroed first.
> The testpmd checksum forwarding engine always zeroed inner checksums.
> If inner checksum calculation was offloaded, that header was left
> with 0 checksum value.
> Following outer software checksum calculation produced wrong value.
> The patch zeroes inner IPv4 checksum only before software calculation.
> 
> Fixes: 51f694dd40f5 ("app/testpmd: rework checksum forward engine")
> 
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org

nit: no blank line between Fixes and Cc lines please

> 
> Signed-off-by: Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>
> ---
> +			} else if (ipv4_hdr->hdr_checksum) {

Please do an explicit comparison with 0 here
as it cannot be considered as a boolean test.

> +				ipv4_hdr->hdr_checksum = 0;
>  				ipv4_hdr->hdr_checksum =
>  					rte_ipv4_cksum(ipv4_hdr);
> +			}