* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] kni: fix unit test segfault
@ 2017-05-03 16:10 Ferruh Yigit
2017-05-04 5:23 ` gowrishankar muthukrishnan
2017-05-05 13:55 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2017-05-03 16:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Monjalon; +Cc: dev, Ferruh Yigit
To clean alloc_q, which has physicall addresses of the mbufs, kni lib
free the pkt_mempool, but this leads a crash in kni unit test.
KNI library shouldn't free the pkt_mempool.
Implementation updated to find the mbufs in the alloc_q and return them
back to mempool.
Fixes: 8eba5ebd1811 ("kni: fix possible memory leak")
Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
---
lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c b/lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c
index 52fcd4b..c3f9208 100644
--- a/lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c
+++ b/lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c
@@ -451,17 +451,35 @@ kni_free_fifo(struct rte_kni_fifo *fifo)
} while (ret);
}
+static void *
+va2pa(struct rte_mbuf *m)
+{
+ return (void *)((unsigned long)m -
+ ((unsigned long)m->buf_addr -
+ (unsigned long)m->buf_physaddr));
+}
+
static void
-kni_free_fifo_phy(struct rte_mempool *pktmbuf_pool, struct rte_kni_fifo *fifo)
+obj_free(struct rte_mempool *mp __rte_unused, void *opaque, void *obj,
+ unsigned obj_idx __rte_unused)
+{
+ struct rte_mbuf *m = obj;
+ void *mbuf_phys = opaque;
+
+ if (va2pa(m) == mbuf_phys)
+ rte_pktmbuf_free(m);
+}
+
+static void
+kni_free_fifo_phy(struct rte_mempool *mp, struct rte_kni_fifo *fifo)
{
void *mbuf_phys;
int ret;
- rte_mempool_free(pktmbuf_pool);
-
- /* All mbufs alredy freed with rte_mempoll_free, just free the fifo */
do {
ret = kni_fifo_get(fifo, &mbuf_phys, 1);
+ if (ret)
+ rte_mempool_obj_iter(mp, obj_free, mbuf_phys);
} while (ret);
}
@@ -557,14 +575,6 @@ rte_kni_handle_request(struct rte_kni *kni)
return 0;
}
-static void *
-va2pa(struct rte_mbuf *m)
-{
- return (void *)((unsigned long)m -
- ((unsigned long)m->buf_addr -
- (unsigned long)m->buf_physaddr));
-}
-
unsigned
rte_kni_tx_burst(struct rte_kni *kni, struct rte_mbuf **mbufs, unsigned num)
{
--
2.9.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] kni: fix unit test segfault
2017-05-03 16:10 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] kni: fix unit test segfault Ferruh Yigit
@ 2017-05-04 5:23 ` gowrishankar muthukrishnan
2017-05-04 14:22 ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-05-05 13:55 ` Thomas Monjalon
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: gowrishankar muthukrishnan @ 2017-05-04 5:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ferruh Yigit; +Cc: dev
Hi Ferruh,
Even w/o this patch, I mostly find mbufs returned by rte_kni_rx_burst()
always 0
(or sometimes 1) where as more than 32000 mbufs approx created in
ingress side
for this test.
dpdk/test/test $ ./test -l 0,1,2 --socket-mem 1024
Am I missing something required for this unit test ?.
Thanks,
Gowrishankar
On Wednesday 03 May 2017 09:40 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> To clean alloc_q, which has physicall addresses of the mbufs, kni lib
> free the pkt_mempool, but this leads a crash in kni unit test.
>
> KNI library shouldn't free the pkt_mempool.
>
> Implementation updated to find the mbufs in the alloc_q and return them
> back to mempool.
>
> Fixes: 8eba5ebd1811 ("kni: fix possible memory leak")
>
> Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> ---
> lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c b/lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c
> index 52fcd4b..c3f9208 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c
> @@ -451,17 +451,35 @@ kni_free_fifo(struct rte_kni_fifo *fifo)
> } while (ret);
> }
>
> +static void *
> +va2pa(struct rte_mbuf *m)
> +{
> + return (void *)((unsigned long)m -
> + ((unsigned long)m->buf_addr -
> + (unsigned long)m->buf_physaddr));
> +}
> +
> static void
> -kni_free_fifo_phy(struct rte_mempool *pktmbuf_pool, struct rte_kni_fifo *fifo)
> +obj_free(struct rte_mempool *mp __rte_unused, void *opaque, void *obj,
> + unsigned obj_idx __rte_unused)
> +{
> + struct rte_mbuf *m = obj;
> + void *mbuf_phys = opaque;
> +
> + if (va2pa(m) == mbuf_phys)
> + rte_pktmbuf_free(m);
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +kni_free_fifo_phy(struct rte_mempool *mp, struct rte_kni_fifo *fifo)
> {
> void *mbuf_phys;
> int ret;
>
> - rte_mempool_free(pktmbuf_pool);
> -
> - /* All mbufs alredy freed with rte_mempoll_free, just free the fifo */
> do {
> ret = kni_fifo_get(fifo, &mbuf_phys, 1);
> + if (ret)
> + rte_mempool_obj_iter(mp, obj_free, mbuf_phys);
> } while (ret);
> }
>
> @@ -557,14 +575,6 @@ rte_kni_handle_request(struct rte_kni *kni)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void *
> -va2pa(struct rte_mbuf *m)
> -{
> - return (void *)((unsigned long)m -
> - ((unsigned long)m->buf_addr -
> - (unsigned long)m->buf_physaddr));
> -}
> -
> unsigned
> rte_kni_tx_burst(struct rte_kni *kni, struct rte_mbuf **mbufs, unsigned num)
> {
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] kni: fix unit test segfault
2017-05-04 5:23 ` gowrishankar muthukrishnan
@ 2017-05-04 14:22 ` Ferruh Yigit
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2017-05-04 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gowrishankar muthukrishnan; +Cc: dev
On 5/4/2017 6:23 AM, gowrishankar muthukrishnan wrote:
> Hi Ferruh,
> Even w/o this patch, I mostly find mbufs returned by rte_kni_rx_burst()
> always 0
> (or sometimes 1) where as more than 32000 mbufs approx created in
> ingress side
> for this test.
>
> dpdk/test/test $ ./test -l 0,1,2 --socket-mem 1024
>
> Am I missing something required for this unit test ?.
Hi Gowrishankar,
KNI module should be inserted with one of the loopback options [1] for
the unit test.
[1]
There are two loopback options supported, both loopbacks Rx/Tx path in
kernel side, this is easy way to test KNI.
options are: lo_mode_fifo and lo_mode_fifo_skb
usage:
insmod build/kmod/rte_kni.ko lo_mode=lo_mode_fifo
or
insmod build/kmod/rte_kni.ko lo_mode=lo_mode_fifo_skb
Regards,
ferruh
>
> Thanks,
> Gowrishankar
>
> On Wednesday 03 May 2017 09:40 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>> To clean alloc_q, which has physicall addresses of the mbufs, kni lib
>> free the pkt_mempool, but this leads a crash in kni unit test.
>>
>> KNI library shouldn't free the pkt_mempool.
>>
>> Implementation updated to find the mbufs in the alloc_q and return them
>> back to mempool.
>>
>> Fixes: 8eba5ebd1811 ("kni: fix possible memory leak")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
>> ---
>> lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c b/lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c
>> index 52fcd4b..c3f9208 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c
>> +++ b/lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c
>> @@ -451,17 +451,35 @@ kni_free_fifo(struct rte_kni_fifo *fifo)
>> } while (ret);
>> }
>>
>> +static void *
>> +va2pa(struct rte_mbuf *m)
>> +{
>> + return (void *)((unsigned long)m -
>> + ((unsigned long)m->buf_addr -
>> + (unsigned long)m->buf_physaddr));
>> +}
>> +
>> static void
>> -kni_free_fifo_phy(struct rte_mempool *pktmbuf_pool, struct rte_kni_fifo *fifo)
>> +obj_free(struct rte_mempool *mp __rte_unused, void *opaque, void *obj,
>> + unsigned obj_idx __rte_unused)
>> +{
>> + struct rte_mbuf *m = obj;
>> + void *mbuf_phys = opaque;
>> +
>> + if (va2pa(m) == mbuf_phys)
>> + rte_pktmbuf_free(m);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void
>> +kni_free_fifo_phy(struct rte_mempool *mp, struct rte_kni_fifo *fifo)
>> {
>> void *mbuf_phys;
>> int ret;
>>
>> - rte_mempool_free(pktmbuf_pool);
>> -
>> - /* All mbufs alredy freed with rte_mempoll_free, just free the fifo */
>> do {
>> ret = kni_fifo_get(fifo, &mbuf_phys, 1);
>> + if (ret)
>> + rte_mempool_obj_iter(mp, obj_free, mbuf_phys);
>> } while (ret);
>> }
>>
>> @@ -557,14 +575,6 @@ rte_kni_handle_request(struct rte_kni *kni)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static void *
>> -va2pa(struct rte_mbuf *m)
>> -{
>> - return (void *)((unsigned long)m -
>> - ((unsigned long)m->buf_addr -
>> - (unsigned long)m->buf_physaddr));
>> -}
>> -
>> unsigned
>> rte_kni_tx_burst(struct rte_kni *kni, struct rte_mbuf **mbufs, unsigned num)
>> {
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] kni: fix unit test segfault
2017-05-03 16:10 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] kni: fix unit test segfault Ferruh Yigit
2017-05-04 5:23 ` gowrishankar muthukrishnan
@ 2017-05-05 13:55 ` Thomas Monjalon
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2017-05-05 13:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ferruh Yigit; +Cc: dev, stable
03/05/2017 18:10, Ferruh Yigit:
> To clean alloc_q, which has physicall addresses of the mbufs, kni lib
> free the pkt_mempool, but this leads a crash in kni unit test.
>
> KNI library shouldn't free the pkt_mempool.
>
> Implementation updated to find the mbufs in the alloc_q and return them
> back to mempool.
>
> Fixes: 8eba5ebd1811 ("kni: fix possible memory leak")
>
> Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Applied, thanks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-05-05 13:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-05-03 16:10 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] kni: fix unit test segfault Ferruh Yigit
2017-05-04 5:23 ` gowrishankar muthukrishnan
2017-05-04 14:22 ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-05-05 13:55 ` Thomas Monjalon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).