From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com (mail-wi0-f180.google.com
 [209.85.212.180]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83AA5CE7
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 09:24:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wiclk2 with SMTP id lk2so14902298wic.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 00:24:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
 bh=khv0omqLfwJQeFMfdOOILcSmXfD1R3BYqrRWXkYvVH8=;
 b=E0mPvtAendVbuNlh3zPWFg1o3Qe1nGmmv/o6rQPZo9Nd16fat37zxy+55N+BBsmqyq
 uP1B9rYLf70aNb4XobdM1dSTfyO/S3v7Zx5MzNeDTPuNEi8z3wotSz19YDBWWQXRD3c9
 ArtpouCR1u1yrEYFVhc7ua6pL0SKw9+mjx7qJlrSOiGz5ZrUbWUhe2sxwUBSpWR9wPqs
 zGOOYGk+klNriJFDBiTwBoZBequ0KWWNkYFLJam8WttjWWmlFCuXpQNTP1BCNLs+rcAJ
 SaqWSw1ZVABF4oFPBHPjCiqCXwuLIQlhj8XZJEFCWRYHenOsxRKNezJwSz6DgasxlgbK
 LfJQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlEZi58/ZJfY2gIkNbZIclBxtxJdce/ZFDlaWQdDKCT4dAYCpYOTu34ezwsB4KmCYzIp9Vi
X-Received: by 10.180.103.72 with SMTP id fu8mr27042827wib.7.1442474685299;
 Thu, 17 Sep 2015 00:24:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id az6sm8462087wib.12.2015.09.17.00.24.44
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Thu, 17 Sep 2015 00:24:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 09:23:35 +0200
Message-ID: <1926548.3ArlD1O00b@xps13>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <E115CCD9D858EF4F90C690B0DCB4D8973C7F79FF@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <1442402465-20158-1-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
 <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725836A870DF@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <E115CCD9D858EF4F90C690B0DCB4D8973C7F79FF@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: add new RX/TX queue state arrays
	in	rte_eth_dev_data
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 07:24:45 -0000

2015-09-16 21:22, De Lara Guarch, Pablo:
> From: Ananyev, Konstantin
> > Why not something like:
> > ret = dev->dev_ops->tx_queue_start(dev, tx_queue_id);
> > if (ret == 0)
> >   dev->data->tx_queue_state[tx_queue_id] =
> > RTE_ETH_QUEUE_STATE_START;
> > 
> > Same for dev_stop and RX.
> > Then you hopefully wouldn't need to update each and every PMD,
> > only rteh_ethdev* would be affected.
> 
> Problem is that some PMDs call internally queue_start/stop, but not the generic rte_eth_rx_queue_start (stop and RX),
> so in that case this would not update the state of the queue.

Why not changing PMD to call rte_eth_rx_queue_start? Do you think it will be
too much error prone for later updates?