DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: akhil.goyal@nxp.com, fiona.trahe@intel.com, arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com,
	orika@mellanox.com, jerinj@marvell.com,
	stephen@networkplumber.org, olivier.matz@6wind.com,
	hemant.agrawal@nxp.com, mdr@ashroe.eu
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] cryptodev: add function to check if qp was setup
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2020 15:37:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1939387.ZpZeW6HBnj@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200624142653.16488-1-arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com>

24/06/2020 16:26, Arek Kusztal:
> From: Fiona Trahe <fiona.trahe@intel.com>
> 
> This patch adds function that can check if queue pair
> was already setup. This may be useful when dealing with
> multi process approach in cryptodev.

That's all? No more justification?
No usage in example apps?
No addition in test apps?
Is it needed for the application?

I don't know cryptodev enough, but I can tell with ethdev experience
that we are a lot more demanding when adding a new API in ethdev.
We are still fixing the API errors done years ago in ethdev,
and it is very difficult to deprecate what was used in the past.
I hope my fear is wrong and you are not doing the same errors
as we did in ethdev, it would be a pity.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-08 13:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-24 14:26 Arek Kusztal
2020-07-02 17:50 ` Akhil Goyal
2020-07-03 14:08   ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2020-07-04 20:11     ` Akhil Goyal
2020-07-08 13:37 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2020-07-08 14:05   ` Akhil Goyal
2020-07-08 14:10   ` Trahe, Fiona

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1939387.ZpZeW6HBnj@thomas \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
    --cc=arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=fiona.trahe@intel.com \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=orika@mellanox.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).