From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC89EA04B5; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:34:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D795A2BD5; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:34:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E97392BD3 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:34:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 916F85C00C5; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 05:34:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 27 Oct 2020 05:34:44 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= jiS443e/vnvl+yxkuqFfohuGrzYY6jaSjX9eVy5wIek=; b=HDzkcHHSswfXPUWP zbAxh/87wOtNFkRRswq2HKkP2tz379QZLXA2JFIUzncYkAVVx5UJ4Svzm8V4BW7I coYm3Fr/BK5PJYIZtjeg1CpmgJUA7oB19tcvomQDrPWPsmZ5C7S0SsWUSLgolXv4 3ZHfBeaqJHPGRzEI2/LaI+IyCwt90bx0BCT8V2SeZOH2l8NllOUUKow8XVUczy+0 /dTqcz6TDskpA0Gk4tUjEUJaXDOE0eGXN8e/EZn/S9tEKZsoXgdXevHvM8Za9ly8 3OynVfV0Y1NbdC7WvNsmiZ9mdANNEBlmB/Cvs0QsXZ2sL94Vl5oa/kSXLPpzuAZ0 cNBrHg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=jiS443e/vnvl+yxkuqFfohuGrzYY6jaSjX9eVy5wI ek=; b=WcR1/fp8ff4JJigqhLjVt3m5OS4O/4yEp6DOC5NCd2VW9x2TeAyWkAi8J k4MNuFbkPQHi1qs60rGaWJJeL/sN8tIFqBX+ORNYcKGcAkXpufQS+6CLDCQJdY59 rMzQj/Bz/Um+y3Ftbhwz0sweIo/oA2JMEt/6BQoPFIvr+ne9YLd+k/MkosJTUl6b voC5M+RWwbVfyNgPPVjbJoyL1GS+bBt33XhEyS2xx5YsGx2sTjhy6BjoIQiLrM5i dUWrsPFcObhjTKGaH/9qQx/cASxQ/Xt4JCQAwWSTGBEN8JcnoSTgnFUVPHwQ/SsN JPNxWL2E/3GNTI2c0C2BEQ50IebPA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrkeelgddthecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefgeelgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdejueei iedvffegheenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuih iivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhho nhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 259B3306467E; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 05:34:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Olivier Matz Cc: dev@dpdk.org, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, david.marchand@redhat.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru, akhil.goyal@nxp.com, Nithin Dabilpuram , Pavan Nikhilesh Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:34:41 +0100 Message-ID: <1945123.3CNhjy3nMc@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20201027093251.GN1898@platinum> References: <20201026052105.1561859-1-thomas@monjalon.net> <20201026222013.2147904-5-thomas@monjalon.net> <20201027093251.GN1898@platinum> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 04/15] node: switch IPv4 metadata to dynamic mbuf field X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 27/10/2020 10:32, Olivier Matz: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 11:20:02PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > +static const struct rte_mbuf_dynfield node_mbuf_priv1_dynfield_desc = { > > + .name = "rte_node_dynfield_priv1", > > + .size = sizeof(struct node_mbuf_priv1 *), > > + .align = __alignof__(struct node_mbuf_priv1 *), > > +}; > > +extern int node_mbuf_priv1_dynfield_offset; > > + > > It should be "struct node_mbuf_priv1", not "struct node_mbuf_priv1 *" Yes, will fix in v3.