From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5B61A04E7; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 16:49:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE600C92A; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 16:49:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from new4-smtp.messagingengine.com (new4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.230]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBB8DC926 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 16:49:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E6D2580542; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 10:49:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 02 Nov 2020 10:49:53 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= lT52HGP3JJmIF7EgxZLp/qiopHxit1rQ6eozmr9lw2g=; b=rb1f9Z4gdJWyJ4Tb J14VnQoNjDFJ8ukysSHyLhjf0CWotewsu/AKtR4XA6YLvcEqntQwcGNZfOm6GWvz MLNmcqgMBjmx/IUW+SoP+pPWcfiGE2iWe3kvollm0lGCKkXyWGp/w0+o/LEmmgAU r1nC634AzfqGz/NBmFF2SVBxKk7WH7M9PTPreMD46u3B2PjvmBDXqBRPRcEEvZrr jDr/rXTGaCuWwILBJADSquYP3IFlARgP8pyN8nga2PoDuKRsOyK9mv9fg5tWo/i5 0UHZXtSiFLd4BJ9+XcTM80KVQTM2lpdZcjWJ8U2xeKID9jUcfs3SvNLHuEc9pf9F xD+8QQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=lT52HGP3JJmIF7EgxZLp/qiopHxit1rQ6eozmr9lw 2g=; b=eg3JjTqArNxZJTFvSF8DY45CZsrUb7kJ0i18lAuoyJ9GtevmLhr+gD+iq 7vho6x2qiPqGwiMUuboiMJjoptTS/Tp/cJj/jsgC+Omqwtt4MfMFGf82EnF4tuX9 KXNpeXckkvX7gKnktggt1wUxnQsNdeXIerlcfkKeUMPiRpOPIvrPYX0Mg29uNApP 6g0q4gyetP7Dc8b2bVZIy2N+V2pzYovX4Rio8SMZgQ7uQ8q+YlEUWyNcAjxvEV9c gO8XOIt4rvaStfZUREigAw2bxdTRW/z274tGdmiKdefjFgV1BfHO1YnXEJJvhKMs Ash7GTwWs9gTjdAiwc3hFofb9Tvdg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedruddtuddgkedtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghl ohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C71B9328005E; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 10:49:49 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Olivier Matz , David Marchand Cc: dev , "Yigit, Ferruh" , Bruce Richardson , Andrew Rybchenko , Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran , Slava Ovsiienko , Ajit Khaparde , Ray Kinsella , Neil Horman Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 16:49:48 +0100 Message-ID: <1945779.j24m6KJYm5@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20201029092751.3837177-1-thomas@monjalon.net> <20201102154146.GA1898@platinum> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 14/14] mbuf: remove deprecated timestamp field X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 02/11/2020 16:47, David Marchand: > On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 4:41 PM Olivier Matz wrote: > > > --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_core.h > > > +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_core.h > > > @@ -149,11 +149,6 @@ extern "C" { > > > */ > > > #define PKT_RX_LRO (1ULL << 16) > > > > > > -/** > > > - * Indicate that the timestamp field in the mbuf is valid. > > > - */ > > > -#define PKT_RX_TIMESTAMP (1ULL << 17) > > > - > > > /** > > > * Indicate that security offload processing was applied on the RX packet. > > > */ > > > > nit: can we keep a comment here to highlight the flag 17 is unused? > > What about marking it free in free_flags? Overkill for a single bit. We will probably use it in future. I will add a comment as suggested by Olivier.