From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com (mail-wi0-f170.google.com
 [209.85.212.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4090D56B7
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 20 May 2015 18:53:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wizk4 with SMTP id k4so162215025wiz.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 20 May 2015 09:53:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
 bh=beJdg9atFc2JG/7Wb618OlPzTyXt+X48BKl78Dz9nQE=;
 b=Id0iTQqBozZYe4dnJLhLfigqlLMGPVykD9BaJSHADlcUqJ3q5HwnthyvIFMkzVaeTI
 //3B22I2p2i9cFqEU1FGcw/wbeU5q+jK7lEeXXDU/MfQTmDaCOVp9lIBVck858r2wNcu
 z54tsT0DQXh5d0LF4gMkeS6xqhCUDxsxubE61Wt6YnjUXoTVzHdRbeLdobrYXinqN9ym
 q92wj7Hbf+B+8DAo9KV2Buaxu3ZtMShp4svJi23BmtDVVFdx3fAev7k7GKNpq3KO88c3
 ZTBZ9drtLHNn5QphXiXCwQ6ZFh/gIJvBnu2qhyHGh5UkvI4lYYQ64LUg1c2qP77oE4ig
 tZKQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnk94Cknv4ycP9k/ipm+2Mt8GLEmHapfXidc7McRHxZQlNTdbG86Dlnk0kwfR2oKlYAfnOY
X-Received: by 10.180.94.106 with SMTP id db10mr42792179wib.1.1432140801150;
 Wed, 20 May 2015 09:53:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xps13.localnet ([62.159.77.186])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id q4sm27741311wja.24.2015.05.20.09.53.19
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Wed, 20 May 2015 09:53:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: "Sujith Sankar (ssujith)" <ssujith@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 18:52:36 +0200
Message-ID: <1959705.x9H0IzcDjV@xps13>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.7 (Linux/4.0.1-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.7; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <D182B6A9.398B6%ssujith@cisco.com>
References: <1431450315-13179-1-git-send-email-bruce.richardson@intel.com>
 <2011983.lTvXhXMBTI@xps13> <D182B6A9.398B6%ssujith@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 06/19] enic: move enic PMD to drivers/net
	directory
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 16:53:21 -0000

2015-05-20 16:45, Sujith Sankar:
> On 20/05/15 9:44 pm, "Thomas Monjalon" <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> wrote:
> >2015-05-20 16:04, Richardson, Bruce:
> >> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> >> > I think that vnic/ should be renamed to base/
> >> 
> >> Yes, I was wondering about that. However, this wasn't a driver I was
> >>familiar with and its origins, so I left it as-is.
> >
> >Sujith imported it with this message:
> >"VNIC common code partially shared with ENIC kernel mode driver"
> >http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-November/008716.html
> 
> Please go ahead with the renaming.
> Is this just for uniformity?  Is there any other reason?

Uniformity and clarity.