From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47FF1A04B1; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 17:30:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0E6B2C27; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 17:29:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B752C2BFF for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 17:29:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5618D5C019E; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 11:29:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 04 Nov 2020 11:29:57 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= 59qEdwBd4JJP7sbaDRGyH9Uy4H29jEbG9G1NikWsA74=; b=rxzH9b42cuRH4DRj fxc9EHOb/0zgl+AvWBXKPCXXQdkO7u3FRloMZVSDAPq/0UPyfQesCI/QkqDGSJHm ANSgN2IC+j97Uc8POfQELISqAhXnqQE4LeysIRAxvCJPAABJmmmAo2EDbRO0t5in hWyI4OT1QAIfC0YkqhcruSoicyNmHw8M3EowQEYgk119yS0tFD4c+L0p20xcDmjf GnGZAFnSDXbkmPRfkIdXXqD0gNRLfcsorOCbthHNlhTH8kA+id1AlEMT6AfbLMSe UMCy0gT+PEDfyFSuz0n2QqTC72RW8SMr0qjtmhvCS4KlrTQwPM4LI3MMsUwdUsVJ UOkTNg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=59qEdwBd4JJP7sbaDRGyH9Uy4H29jEbG9G1NikWsA 74=; b=UpQP72Gm3g4Yav4psmej24Ab5ml5edsBggwm6USUUR7yQv1k48t9PKaEq riCJxgFEoGv48w1kZSuGuJxNoZzwilNnuiU46zYO3oEecW98FGJMP3gPgL5OsHbi MWq5UJjlMmiUKcf2wP8RH0BL0HAfnZ4kc8AcxBNO85W6qf39AxyhhtYQRT2aL6RM KYHpjN/Y2Q1FnXg2OrKx4juVsuA97Zxj9Dnm8XJG8A0zOwjvXRhp9rYwyMPaODY7 /Lwfo+3Q6P6Z/GpA6so2Izl8ywlo1HWuJzvP6BeBXKiezxnda7C9ikhC5W6zGFAm h7vPfNgZPysOpg6SCw2uQHXQeynKw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedruddthedgledtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghl ohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A6D3E3064674; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 11:29:55 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Andrew Rybchenko Cc: dev@dpdk.org, david.marchand@redhat.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, ruifeng.wang@arm.com Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 17:29:54 +0100 Message-ID: <1960239.eSrms1GG6d@thomas> In-Reply-To: <1603369447-28388-1-git-send-email-arybchenko@solarflare.com> References: <1603369447-28388-1-git-send-email-arybchenko@solarflare.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] common/sfc_efx: introduce 128-bit unsigned integer compat X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 22/10/2020 14:24, Andrew Rybchenko: > Intel SSE has __m128i, but ARMv8 has __uint128_t. So, add compat > efsys_uint128_t to be used in driver source and have either __u128i > or __uint128_t behind. Could we do something in EAL for this common need?