From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 897CDA0547; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 09:51:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CC2F415D7; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 09:51:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15541415D0 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 09:51:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A9FC5C00CB; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 03:51:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 20 Apr 2021 03:51:46 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= QCzQItbJTTEZapuFRzsxEbp+MKX3cKTjQHwN3h3AtEo=; b=KgN933tEzv5A9xJK 6t8kKDrQRlj4xBj2Zf/DJjue2brU7o1PDe3CCVE81ap9Vgyo2QuCw9yyhoFfnfei 0/341cLjpVNDzpjgDeNXS6JIv1EXSV6rtZOLGiZQNVA7pxZU6j5AzaIA4QwUFFRA NK+y9xSbsy00w3PQ+xU4Slt0BFAi2nMTnAiabMSGHC/Jy0Z6F/d42vzgtMTqBOUQ J8f6xK51pHabdpnrv30Uw4akIWCkn+GHoU0AWxuQzczgOu1qm+StCqF9kzEuzb+1 irokW737zyjQQ8wFGGZhA3trNSqKUgCeTwa62aCfIaBBk4JYdenQEECpZxWTZmq2 U1BCjA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=QCzQItbJTTEZapuFRzsxEbp+MKX3cKTjQHwN3h3At Eo=; b=ZL13MwlryHt5xBAvsdpmYeGpQIW968KJDBxGL6U60LyvlAzbYxUxMosmF pguWglBj2mjM88pepL18FKByisO69mdHOBMys/5iTiZPl3gzmGJ2dbjb5jAmN+fO zKupxeskhl48CNec0tILj6vwITGKxj0shqmahWAjvVMvlvLuAqXujn1je2T3B/7R NnPyaGeeqBHa/Gk9KDLeavO8qHORCj4IBVn4liglFKhfcOkgnD3FJl4sClLg+lb5 FYDxRYEhhitrjjbG2PZsj4e8KUoSd38SK9objVaq2VASNMRgrdNsYalYfEB+K0Sm kcY7k2hPwxfBTAfqKPGuUqKRnPYPg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvddthedguddviecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeffvdffjeeuteelfeeileduudeugfetjeelveefkeejfeeigeeh teffvdekfeegudenucffohhmrghinhepughpughkrdhorhhgnecukfhppeejjedrudefge drvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhl fhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B044F240057; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 03:51:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Liu, Lingyu" Cc: Olivier Matz , "dev@dpdk.org" , "Zhang, Qi Z" , "david.marchand@redhat.com" , Hemant Agrawal Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 09:51:41 +0200 Message-ID: <1960280.AK4zKTLmrX@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20210417090415.5477-1-lingyu.liu@intel.com> <20210419142453.GC1726@platinum> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mbuf: support eCPRI hardware packet type X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 20/04/2021 04:17, Liu, Lingyu: > Hi Olivier, > > This new packet type will be used by iavf driver to map ECPRI hardware packet. > This is the patch which will use this new hardware packet type. > http://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20210420083817.10741-3-lingyu.liu@intel.com/ I think it does not reply Olivier's question about how it will be used. Why is it important to report this packet type in mbuf? PS: please do not top-post > > From: Olivier Matz > > > > Hi Lingyu, > > > > On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 09:25:31AM +0000, Lingyu Liu wrote: > > > Add L2_ETHER_ECPRI and L4_UDP_TUNNEL_ECPRI in RTE_PTYPE. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Lingyu Liu > > > Acked-by: Hemant Agrawal > > > > The number of available packet types for tunnels is quite low (already > > mentionned in this thread [1]). > > > > [1] https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20210408081720.23314-3- > > ktejasree@marvell.com > > > > Can you give some details about how it will be used? For instance, which > > driver will set it, which kind of application will use it. > > > > Thanks, > > Olivier