From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31ECAA0487
for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Fri, 5 Jul 2019 11:02:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0A311BDE6;
Fri, 5 Jul 2019 11:02:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com
[66.111.4.26]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A6AC1B9D5
for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 5 Jul 2019 11:02:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41])
by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A326222006;
Fri, 5 Jul 2019 05:02:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162])
by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 05 Jul 2019 05:02:33 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h=
from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references
:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp;
bh=S4JOYyzWnwTwr00e4k1qE3CEftJyrbhClGFA5Ld2yRA=; b=VVLdF//W9PtC
czdBXJOKKLj6SEeP17jROwpoH69Yzko/Vx5vX1Hl626Xi2FAqEY/Ej1HDKyN25Q5
0RvBvet9/rKr9RCPxOQeNbQqV/P6EVLGPm1p0H7DgC/yK6tAbUV090G7N3negpNa
6yIG+MO31vktWp58TJd0h1S9l8VW6Zk=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type
:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender
:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=S4JOYyzWnwTwr00e4k1qE3CEftJyrbhClGFA5Ld2y
RA=; b=VNcwT4u1TMzowLGdjXNvHrN0j4Q2duaq/Rsv8uPCPAQWeyHjf9oooXiFC
q5BvB7CLPJCZih2V1ThE74DfDr5O470gVYddGEDakHVMEgE4BwMUet4/FElhVqdL
xjRFTV09eznNEoi1WJp/SDYZ8GXG5gvQBRducj/+LcRBZX28GN1xOrHjew4uyGGb
y5B9sGaJIEvthf9QEKei4dYN7QPPHtp/Gt7NklVDzcEu0zX9VcqW35aq1POHU6lg
CM0o5wntxTAzt/akboDc5t++ff7uj5jMu1BZM9yfK2V8OPhJFLC/b0IEuis6B8f6
MPjRMu2FDoPVbDLtTxK1lKXNqTmzA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:KRIfXa9ioLDZUjnGpQ3HgDJRMW11T3ETTEjlQw6fHZTkjswrZ58p1Q>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrfeeggdduudcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf
curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu
uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertd
dttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgrshcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehm
ohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecuffhomhgrihhnpehhuhgrrhhmrdgtohhmnecukfhppe
ejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhm
rghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:KRIfXcQSrwA8sCOV1HuVBy_Tz0Kp2SJrsHaR837UhKeRLwniMNCQrw>
<xmx:KRIfXV8LoPz_6HCelA6BH9cxKRAOrG21_znz3FKcxLdZjhMniz66Iw>
<xmx:KRIfXVu74mRgEpjP_rfwt4o0ofEva1HJ2SAr-t1EPryq5YUc9jzulQ>
<xmx:KRIfXWbi3EPCM2w2egWBgjCBlBbO1OonB16g7tNBhIWlvOFa7EHapg>
Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184])
by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6DC418005C;
Fri, 5 Jul 2019 05:02:32 -0400 (EDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: pbhagavatula@marvell.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, gavin.hu@arm.com, jerinj@marvell.com
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2019 11:02:31 +0200
Message-ID: <1966653.7aN1hUl6W2@xps>
In-Reply-To: <20190705042650.3457-1-pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
References: <20190705042650.3457-1-pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mempool/octeontx2: fix arm64 clang build
failure
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
<mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
<mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
05/07/2019 06:26, pbhagavatula@marvell.com:
> From: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
>
> The ARMv8.1 CASP instruction works with even register pairs and since
> there no register constraint in older versions of GCC/Clang, use
> explicit register allocation to satisfy CASP requirements.
> Remove function level optimization specification as Clang doesnt have
> support for it and explicit register allocation removes the need for it.
>
> Fixes build issue with arm64-armv8a-linux-clang.
>
> Fixes: ee338015e7a9 ("mempool/octeontx2: add optimized dequeue operation for arm64")
>
> Reported-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
> Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>
Applied, thanks