From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91DAF46BCB; Sun, 20 Jul 2025 22:44:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3138A402D6; Sun, 20 Jul 2025 22:44:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fout-a8-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-a8-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.151]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C41B84026D; Sun, 20 Jul 2025 22:44:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from phl-compute-12.internal (phl-compute-12.phl.internal [10.202.2.52]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 606D2EC010B; Sun, 20 Jul 2025 16:44:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-01 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-12.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 20 Jul 2025 16:44:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1753044268; x=1753130668; bh=Gcb7RrkgPZXRL3wzY6mJbwu4YYmRFL1kxjSKsYCX/fk=; b= Cvw2anjnVrgd1k+KMYXvp53TvfOhdx/eWa8Grl9kcnSHtmN1/tHKf+WxVRsS+4lp IM1AQEiCZOJartAInfxzyFf3EsIFcL0jIkykfuaMhawozYK1kT+sDso1nTEnvVVQ FjUNhr7QnQANhUbnFTBDGdJA6W4K5W20HK39kEss2TAGtWmSgIVKKPRjdWxOcrc4 NS+4yzHuSydtySOjpYKfmoAvpc5Bru/YGNfA7vBMXGwqHai9PviOuDuY+pZVavJs HP93ud4Y+KVE/pV7p+mrfX72U+vN8+3neJSbEvGqbBPQqU6o8ZMeoigcjOc5lYhS cWbSJRQahY8uArnvU4kDmw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1753044268; x= 1753130668; bh=Gcb7RrkgPZXRL3wzY6mJbwu4YYmRFL1kxjSKsYCX/fk=; b=b eEEySnUnydQsXihLkbn3xks4+a7USbo/o+QGGvH83RG05sBLxmFw7QMbbAyTIJd+ 6+P8y38JDbYtk/fQztjEYTzfbkhmFEwaY+1Y1l1VFg40PeRq0n79IrhoGxEAOLGk wQcBiwiLzAXahMF93conU9WvYoIUF13pDaWU1ElDS3vn6C7eAchWC980bM+3S+fb wrQTd6OYIsN4HdACLX3TriUKv8LbxbZhzEfjVsOka08MhAQwfTFiAcTMafSJyPVQ cVjPaSVOk4O9DzXuI2Wo0kztQqBORk2wsbz8hXSIuskC1XjDK04zc118djXg1qMG TYlmVgKyas5UBR91vsYTQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtdefgdejtddulecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegr ihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjug hrpefhvfevufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgrshcu ofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrf grthhtvghrnhepjeduveehieevuddutdevfffgtdegkeeuveejffejgedtgeegkefgvdeu gfefkeejnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomh epthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvthdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepfedpmhho uggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtoheprggtohhnohhlvgesrhgvughhrghtrdgtoh hmpdhrtghpthhtohepuggvvhesughpughkrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepthgvtghhsgho rghrugesughpughkrdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 20 Jul 2025 16:44:27 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Aaron Conole Cc: dev@dpdk.org, techboard@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: Document frequency and volume limits on patches. Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2025 22:44:25 +0200 Message-ID: <1978264.taCxCBeP46@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20250417181211.727663-1-aconole@redhat.com> References: <20250417181211.727663-1-aconole@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org 17/04/2025 20:12, Aaron Conole: > The DPDK project has two constrained resources - reviewers and > public CI infrastructure. These are shared among the entire > project, and there are true costs associated with using these > resources. Thus, there are two motivations behind this change: > - Encourage developers to spend more time ensuring their > changes are in a state that things have gone through some > basic testing > - Encourage people to give reviews by guaranteeing that the > time between series is long enough that comments will be > valid. > > We want to document the guidelines for submitting to the list > to encourage more time for reviews, and also encourage > developers to spend a bit more time to put their submissions > in a 'default accept' condition. > > Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole Fixed links and applied, thanks.