From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22D1DA04BA; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 17:41:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 049551C231; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 17:41:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B24391C22B for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 17:41:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DBA56DB; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 11:41:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 02 Oct 2020 11:41:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= DzJGyOEqLoXxTiuuL0hSxMRDI/SQsB3cq7SmmMVtwqM=; b=saQYa0iTT7uVy/ve qRuIwwlm7Z96vczrHw+JqpXgpuSvZVtibBLNhuk71xjiaDweCRXT0+QniVRRnrGN LILsy4W106vSSnc2FmQiNyihbZ/MZj/kwx6cldnKTmehhUwdWAWBpTud/gYrH4mH qmQ85qZ+xk0liAVqSGZis8O44w6VILzChtyUq9yDUuXyLwx5UC3CleHacP7ZHtWj 5F9QmEuBTA97Pe9xBNWe7JpK6IymcutHSEL/pqI+r5DmlEvRYZvFQ5ETOxkHwhfE DQYDZnolSNohiPH6gLSqAT2F/TfjAYc0ixTs9QjwtJh/owXdLmzE1Ze09P80MjWP nQEMIw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=DzJGyOEqLoXxTiuuL0hSxMRDI/SQsB3cq7SmmMVtw qM=; b=KLQpSZMhz/h2G4IuVdwDWy0r4EE0HTysMW9FFEGb/Ut2dOupv1oomRKx0 /6zGQWbVrQA/2SdH3OrTY7JaXjTBfU+m5UGKE++6B5IxeWQMxnbjlI6RmZxbN/oA tB3oHM2/HZ1ZjV585wp20i9V5zUCdHBStVBgV7184Urx/vwAteLj++2d46HLocgC JNogahTShvCeBfw3RYXkYPxXE3JrGM8Z0MVT3MvsMXG5n5ve+6MfXXLea2eYF6yj G7Qohaccv0Zk3l0k6dyqGQTGx+8uJAC1aJewgIi0HjzA6Bztzk/aNF9gQBfXF0Yp 34mGY4lpRTEdoIjiQMKzpcbpsjZ7g== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrfeeigdeludcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpeffvdffjeeuteelfeeileduudeugfetjeelveefkeejfeeigeehteff vdekfeegudenucffohhmrghinhepughpughkrdhorhhgnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvd dtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhr ohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 36D6A328005E; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 11:41:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Tom Rix Cc: "Chautru, Nicolas" , "dev@dpdk.org" Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2020 17:41:07 +0200 Message-ID: <1985785.NsDeZ6iOcB@thomas> In-Reply-To: <1dbf4aaf-7a77-101d-24ea-6e3faec6165f@redhat.com> References: <20201001143030.9194-1-trix@redhat.com> <3460938.iZNE5J4TDP@thomas> <1dbf4aaf-7a77-101d-24ea-6e3faec6165f@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: New Reviewer entry type added to MAINTAINERS X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 02/10/2020 16:59, Tom Rix: > > On 10/1/20 2:54 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 01/10/2020 23:22, Chautru, Nicolas: > >> From: trix@redhat.com > >>> From: Tom Rix > >>> > >>> Copied from the Linux kernel MAINTAINERS file. > >>> A Reviewer is designated person who wishes to review changes in areas of > >>> interest. > >>> > >>> Added self as Reviewer for baseband. > >>> > >>> I am a Linux kernel Reviewer for the fpga n3000/vista creek which has > >>> several bitstream based baseband devices. So I want to help out here as > >>> well. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix > >> Thanks for the help. > >> Note that they are a few other BBDEV patches in flight for 20.11 on top of the acc100 PMD that you may want to be aware of. > >> https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=&submitter=chautru&state=&q=&archive=&delegate= > >> > >> Acked-by: Nicolas Chautru > > [...] > >>> Baseband API - EXPERIMENTAL > >>> M: Nicolas Chautru > >>> +R: Tom Rix > > I don't understand the need of differenciating maintainer and reviewer. > > If you are trusted enough, why not just being co-maintainer? > > > I want to help out with the reviews, the reviewer type makes clear this level of commitment. > > Maintainer is the next, higher level of commitment. > > > Trust wise, this would allow the maintainer verify the reviewer does have the bandwidth to be responsive > > and effective before committing to sharing responsibility. Sorry I fail to understand. My understanding is that you want to be Cc but not committing for responsibility. Would it be the same if you create a mail filter on your side? This model is really not clear to me so I'm reluctant to add such new category until I understand the benefit.