From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Wei Dai <wei.dai@intel.com>, thomas@monjalon.net, qi.z.zhang@intel.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] ethdev: check Rx/Tx offloads
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 16:50:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <199f655c-1327-326b-c1b1-5e4fbefc6ae2@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1524753466-17021-1-git-send-email-wei.dai@intel.com>
On 4/26/2018 3:37 PM, Wei Dai wrote:
> This patch check if a requested offloading is supported
> in the device capability.
> Any offloading is disabled by default if it is not set
> in rte_eth_dev_configure( ) and rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup().
> A per port offloading can only be enabled in
> rte_eth_dev_configure(). If a per port offloading is
> sent to rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( ), return error.
> Only per queue offloading can be sent to
> rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( ). A per queue offloading is
> enabled only if it is enabled in rte_eth_dev_configure( ) OR
> if it is enabled in rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( ).
> If a per queue offloading is enabled in rte_eth_dev_configure(),
> it can't be disabled in rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( ).
> If a per queue offloading is disabled in rte_eth_dev_configure( ),
> it can be enabled or disabled( ) in rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( ).
>
> This patch can make such checking in a common way in rte_ethdev
> layer to avoid same checking in underlying PMD.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Dai <wei.dai@intel.com>
> ---
> lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> index f0f53d4..5485f47 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> @@ -1196,6 +1196,28 @@ rte_eth_dev_configure(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t nb_rx_q, uint16_t nb_tx_q,
> ETHER_MAX_LEN;
> }
>
> + /* Any requested offload must be within its device capability */
> + if ((local_conf.rxmode.offloads & dev_info.rx_offload_capa) !=
> + local_conf.rxmode.offloads) {
> + RTE_PMD_DEBUG_TRACE("ethdev port_id=%d requested Rx offloads "
> + "0x%" PRIx64 " doesn't match Rx offloads "
> + "capability 0x%" PRIx64 "\n",
> + port_id,
> + local_conf.rxmode.offloads,
> + dev_info.rx_offload_capa);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + if ((local_conf.txmode.offloads & dev_info.tx_offload_capa) !=
> + local_conf.txmode.offloads) {
> + RTE_PMD_DEBUG_TRACE("ethdev port_id=%d requested Tx offloads "
> + "0x%" PRIx64 " doesn't match Tx offloads "
> + "capability 0x%" PRIx64 "\n",
> + port_id,
> + local_conf.txmode.offloads,
> + dev_info.tx_offload_capa);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> /*
> * Setup new number of RX/TX queues and reconfigure device.
> */
> @@ -1547,6 +1569,23 @@ rte_eth_rx_queue_setup(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t rx_queue_id,
> &local_conf.offloads);
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Only per-queue offload can be enabled from application.
> + * If any pure per-port offload is sent to this function, return -EINVAL
This comment doesn't match below check, below doesn't check pure per-port offload
> + */
> + if ((local_conf.offloads & dev_info.rx_queue_offload_capa) !=
> + local_conf.offloads) {> + RTE_PMD_DEBUG_TRACE("Ethdev port_id=%d rx_queue_id=%d "
> + "Requested offload 0x%" PRIx64 "doesn't "
> + "match per-queue capability 0x%" PRIx64
> + " in rte_eth_rx_queue_setup( )\n",
> + port_id,
> + rx_queue_id,
> + local_conf.offloads,
> + dev_info.rx_queue_offload_capa);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
Lets add one more check and consider this for rc1, later we can update checks
for suggested API in rc2.
Check to add (this is for existing API)
If a pure per-port update enabled configure, it should be enabled in
queue_setup() as well.
> +
> ret = (*dev->dev_ops->rx_queue_setup)(dev, rx_queue_id, nb_rx_desc,
> socket_id, &local_conf, mp);
> if (!ret) {
> @@ -1681,6 +1720,23 @@ rte_eth_tx_queue_setup(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t tx_queue_id,
> &local_conf.offloads);
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Only per-queue offload can be enabled from applcation.
> + * If any pure per-port offload is sent to this function, return -EINVAL
> + */
> + if ((local_conf.offloads & dev_info.tx_queue_offload_capa) !=
> + local_conf.offloads) {
> + RTE_PMD_DEBUG_TRACE("Ethdev port_id=%d tx_queue_id=%d "
> + "Requested offload 0x%" PRIx64 "doesn't "
> + "match per-queue capability 0x%" PRIx64
> + " in rte_eth_tx_queue_setup( )\n",
> + port_id,
> + tx_queue_id,
> + local_conf.offloads,
> + dev_info.tx_queue_offload_capa);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> return eth_err(port_id, (*dev->dev_ops->tx_queue_setup)(dev,
> tx_queue_id, nb_tx_desc, socket_id, &local_conf));
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-26 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-01 13:53 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: check consistency of per port offloads Wei Dai
2018-03-28 8:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ethdev: check Rx/Tx offloads Wei Dai
2018-04-13 17:31 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-15 10:37 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-16 3:06 ` Dai, Wei
2018-04-25 11:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Wei Dai
2018-04-25 11:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Wei Dai
2018-04-25 11:49 ` Wei Dai
2018-04-25 11:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Wei Dai
2018-04-25 17:04 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-26 7:59 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2018-04-26 8:18 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-26 8:51 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2018-04-26 14:45 ` Dai, Wei
2018-04-26 14:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " Wei Dai
2018-04-26 15:50 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2018-04-26 15:56 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-26 15:59 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-26 16:11 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-03 1:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] " Wei Dai
2018-05-04 11:12 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-04 14:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7] " Wei Dai
2018-05-04 14:42 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-04 14:45 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-05 18:59 ` Shahaf Shuler
2018-05-07 7:15 ` Dai, Wei
2018-05-08 10:58 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-08 10:05 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8] " Wei Dai
2018-05-08 10:41 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-05-08 11:02 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-08 11:22 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-05-08 11:37 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-05-08 12:34 ` Dai, Wei
2018-05-08 12:12 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-09 12:45 ` Dai, Wei
2018-05-10 0:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9] ethdev: new Rx/Tx offloads API Wei Dai
2018-05-10 0:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10] " Wei Dai
2018-05-10 1:28 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-10 2:35 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-10 11:27 ` Dai, Wei
2018-05-10 9:25 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-05-10 19:47 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-10 11:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11] " Wei Dai
2018-05-10 11:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12] " Wei Dai
2018-05-10 21:39 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-14 8:37 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-14 11:19 ` Dai, Wei
2018-05-10 21:48 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-14 12:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v13] " Wei Dai
2018-05-14 12:54 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-14 13:26 ` Dai, Wei
2018-05-14 13:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v14] " Wei Dai
2018-05-14 14:11 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-14 14:46 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-10 21:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10] " Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-08 10:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8] ethdev: check Rx/Tx offloads Wei Dai
2018-05-08 17:51 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-05-09 2:10 ` Dai, Wei
2018-05-09 14:11 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-09 22:40 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=199f655c-1327-326b-c1b1-5e4fbefc6ae2@intel.com \
--to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=wei.dai@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).