From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>,
dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/pcap: convert license headers to SPDX tags
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 11:29:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19f21831-355c-345e-669a-9d478facd340@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171219101816.GD7384@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com>
On 12/19/2017 2:18 AM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 01:18:33PM -0800, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>> On 12/18/2017 1:06 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
>>
>> <...>
>>
>>> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
>>> + * Copyright(c) 2010-2016 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
>>> + * Copyright(c) 2014 6WIND S.A.
>>> + * All rights reserved.
>>> */
>>
>> Hi Hemant, Thomas,
>>
>> Can you please suggest about extra "All rights reserved." line.
>>
>> It is in the part of the BSD header, and I _assume_ that has been intended to
>> cover all "Copyright" lines above it.
>> But since some of the Copyright holders (at least Intel ones) already has that
>> in same line with copyright and I _assume_ this is intentional because of legal
>> requirements, can we remove that line.
>>
>> I guess we have two options while removing it, applying it to all previous
>> Copyright lines (B) or just remove it (A):
>>
>> (A)
>> SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
>> Copyright(c) 2010-2016 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
>> Copyright(c) 2014 6WIND S.A.
>>
>> (B)
>> SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
>> Copyright(c) 2010-2016 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
>> Copyright(c) 2014 6WIND S.A. All rights reserved.
>>
>>
>> Can we go with option (A)?
>
> Hi Ferruh,
>
> I'm looking to replace a lot of the Intel-copyright license headers -
> automating it right now. The latest Intel template actually has the
> "all rights reserved" omitted. [See my patch for meson.build files]
Batch update is good idea, thanks.
If your patch doesn't cover this I update the patch to omit that part.
Thanks,
ferruh
>
> /Bruce
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-19 19:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-18 21:06 Ferruh Yigit
2017-12-18 21:18 ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-12-18 21:35 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-12-19 5:02 ` Hemant Agrawal
2017-12-19 10:18 ` Bruce Richardson
2017-12-19 19:29 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2017-12-19 19:41 ` Bruce Richardson
2017-12-19 19:48 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-01-09 13:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Ferruh Yigit
2018-01-10 6:28 ` Hemant Agrawal
2018-01-11 17:56 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-16 13:07 ` Olivier Matz
2018-01-16 16:15 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19f21831-355c-345e-669a-9d478facd340@intel.com \
--to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).